smashingmayo

Mar 19, 2013

I didn't say I did date that age range in the past couple years. It was a few years ago. But although that age range is picky, look how amny 18 yos do date guys older than me, even as old as 80+.
MsOtis

Mar 19, 2013

^ Whoa!! You said that only gay people dated when the ages are so far apart. Did I finally convince you that wasn't true, with my Hugh Hefner example?

Great!

smashingmayo

Mar 19, 2013

I dunno what you're talking about. You're not drunk liek Ohio girls, are you?
tyrebiter

Mar 19, 2013

If you look at Maslow's hierarchy of needs, sex is down there at the bottom of the the pyramid with food a drink.

Therefore for someone who is doing without sex, sex is probably the most important thing that there is for that person . When a woman is dating a full grown man who has been a virgin for very long, she will be afraid if she dates this virgin and she is alone with him, he will be thinking "Rape, is job#1!".

Divis1onbyzer0

Mar 19, 2013

^ or maybe he does not know how to change. Difference. Not wanting to change is one thing. Not knowing how to change is another. Try OP!! Try to change. Better than nothing!

 

it's a good point.

lexifromwindy

Mar 19, 2013

The OP is something of an extremist. that alone is reducing his "pool" of interested candidates. many of them in this now smaller pool will obviously be hyper left wing, which tends to be girls who are hyper sexualized. what i mean by that is that left wide women having totally embraced the do as you please, there are no consequences, never think about anything but yourself so have sex all the time will be having sex, a lot. the notion that its bad to do so, or repressive to believe in some kind of exterior consequence to promiscuity is distinctly right wing. religious even. so, in this diminished pool, there are primarily women who've had a lot of sex, and want a lover that really knows what hes doing. most left wingers dont get this, but book learning cant teach you everything. otherwise you could read a book about boxing then go toe to toe with rocky. if he was real. anyway, the point being that the left wing argument against this is that since they read a book on sex once they know where everything is and are therefore good at sex, a physical activity that requires practice to become good at. so, by being obviously bad at sex, the op reduces his pool to nearly zero, just by being a left wing extremist, then especially by being one.

amp-here

Mar 19, 2013

otherwise you could read a book about boxing then go toe to toe with rocky.

    There are many limits to that logic.  In boxing, there's no limit to how much speed is useful or how much fine-tuned quick-response coordination is needed and you're trying to pull off movements ahead of and out of sync with the other person.

  A much closer comparison involves sports with similar gross motor skills and synchronization to sex...such as learning how to, say, ride a tandem bike or dance two-step.  It's just relatively basic strength and rhythm and, unless you're planning to do acrobatic sex, no harder or less humanly learned than things like riding a bike or learning to snap your fingers. 

  However, there are a few things you can't learn.  If you're out of shape and your blood flow is horrid, you might not be able to get "it" up and/or get out of breath before your partner does.  One huge point is...what limits sex isn't necessary you, but who is the weakest link (often so far as a combination of health and determination) between you and your partner.

----------

a physical activity that requires practice to become good at.

   In short, sure, you have to learn it...but the learning curve is not steep and the human body is designed to learn it quickly (like learning to ride a bike).  What you can do is read the books and then get some minimal practice (even just 1-2 women should be enough if you come in with the idea that the point is to please her and not yourself and are in as good to better shape than the women you "have").

 

lexifromwindy

Mar 19, 2013

...you went to a lot of trouble to make no point at all. you neither agreed nor disagreed. odd.

smashingmayo

Mar 19, 2013

hyper sexualized females are way overrated. I guess it's good for people not looking for relationships, but no matter WHO you are you'll be cheated on, for example, and plus it's just annoying.
Pilank

Mar 20, 2013

The Hyper-sexualized female is a mythical creature you guys have seen in some porno.

Lexi, I think they may have bus service or elevated trains or some kind of mass transit where you live, but out in the country a man needs to drive a car. What the O P has to find is a woman who will drive herself out to the country and meet him. That will not happen in real life.

In our American way of life, the free market has come up with a solution for hyper-virginity, prostitution.

For prostitutes, virgins are their share of the entertainment market.

Finding a girlfriend is a challenge for a man who has a job and is not a wierdo, I'm sorry OP but you just can't expect someone to fall for you.

Now that Obama and the liberals have taken over our country, the thing to do, is a solution to our over crowded prisons.

Punish women who have been convicted of a crime by coercing them to date undatable men.

When a woman gets sentenced, her sentence could be a certain number of months or a certain # of undatable guys.

If the hyper-liberals think that America has to allow gay marriage to provide equal protection under the law, then why can't we change our mating customs to help out the undatable guys?

While you may think there is something wrong with a prisoner dating a loser, well ,a few years ago we all thought same sex marriage was wrong and we could not imagine such a thing happening in real life.

Divis1onbyzer0

Mar 20, 2013

..you went to a lot of trouble to make no point at all. you neither agreed nor disagreed. odd.

 

Probably because your wall of text was meaningless gibberish.

Pilank

Mar 20, 2013

"the notion that its bad to do so, or repressive to believe in some kind of exterior consequence to promiscuity is distinctly right wing."

No the problem with promiscuity is it requires that a woman has a pool of men she would want to have sex with. There are so many losers out there, she is lucky if she can find 1 guy who is desirable.

"want a lover that really knows what hes doing."

All he has to know is get naked, get an erection, and he is ready for felatio.

the actual Sex does not require you to learn any skills. What guys need to do is learn how to be the kind of man who a woman would want to sex.

amp-here

Mar 20, 2013


you neither agreed nor disagreed. odd.

*sigh* Is the point to lean almost completely toward either agreeing or disagreeing?  I don't see things in black and white, and I'm not interested in beating your argument, so to speak, but am interested in finding a productive answer (which is, usually, a compromise of sorts). 

 

Punish women who have been convicted of a crime by coercing them to date undatable men.

Trolling much?  You sound as crazy and useless as Chaeeeeeeeeed.

 

Probably because your wall of text was meaningless gibberish.

   Or, more likely, it's beyond your wildest imagination that the human body was built for sex, and learning how to do it decently need not require much real life practice. Some people can get good at it during their first time or even start as being good at it.  Also, please...my "wall of text" was no longer than her original wall.

    My point (dummies version) is that, sure sex requires real-world practice, sure, but often not much, and more like barely any, for someone who's healthy and determined to please.

smashingmayo

Mar 20, 2013

I never realized pilank was mythical.
amp-here

Mar 20, 2013

No the problem with promiscuity is it requires that a woman has a pool of men she would want to have sex with.

^ I've seen Pilank change her profile gender from gay to straight...and from several skinny face pics as her main pics despite having an obvious obese-ish looking secondarypic. So comments like the above scream of hypocrisy.

 

All he has to know is get naked, get an erection, and he is ready for felatio.

Ha...that, and hold the erection, hold his release (e.g. try not to be a one-pump chump) and have enough discipline to give some foreplay before he lets loose (none of the above of which is hard, at all).  What you're saying is the other extreme...that sex requires no practice or discipline at all.  Have you ever had good sex?...it sounds like your perceptions are shaped by guys who have no intention to use even the slight amount of discipline required to learn sex (the kind of guys you attract?!).

  Now I can see why your profile used to read "gay"...

 

 

 

Post a comment