42,333 online now

The Google of
online dating

— The Boston Globe

The
best free dating site

— About.com

A favorite hangout
for internet goers

— The Village Voice

Completely free

— TIME

Join Us!

Message Her

Join OkCupid

Find better matches with our advanced matching system

An image of nahgems
An image of nahgems
—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy

nahgems

30 / F / Straight / Married

East Rochester, New York

Her journal posts

You took my journal seriously. It made me sad.

My sister (the artist formerly known as triangle_girl) says that my journal is "based on real life" the way that lifetime movies are. I'm not entirely sure how she knows about lifetime movies. She has a 12" TV that she got off craigslist for $5. It has rabbit ear antennae and gets five somewhat fuzzy channels. Lifetime television for women is definitely not one of them. And if it were, I would like to think she wouldn't watch it. In fact, I highly doubt she has ever actually watched an entire lifetime movie.

When she wants to watch TV she comes over to my house (six houses away). I have a much bigger, nicer TV. And my antenna is on the roof so although I get the same five channels that she does, they are much clearer at my house. I also have a DVR to record these 5 channels. DVRs are cool because you can fast-forward the commercials. Commercials are icky (except the ones for Rozerem. If I ever need a sleep aid, I am totally going to use Rozerem, because my prescription drug decisions should be made completely based on commercials featuring our 16th president, an astronaut and a beaver...).

Anyways, that was not the point of this rant. The point was that (according to my sister) the veracity of my journal is similar to that of a lifetime move. I occasionally embellish the truth because it is much more interesting that way. I don't outright lie, but two days ago when I said that creepy guys scared my sister away, the reality was that she mostly got bored with OkCupid. You guys just weren't entertaining enough (although there was this guy that was pretty creepy...). And while my sister's hair is slightly unkempt, calling it "a cross between a fiery tumbleweed and an electrocuted hamster" may have been a bit harsh. And on the 25th when I said that it was possible my research would accomplish evil things, I wasn't actually worried that my research would accomplish evil things. In fact, I find it highly unlikely (but possible). And yesterday when I wrote a post "complaining" that OkCupid had labeled me as "pure" and "compassionate", I didn't really need your reassurance that "I don't think anyone takes the icons seriously". And Saturday when I posted concern because one of my acquaintances called me, Career Girl™ Barbie®, I wasn't actually worried that I resembled Career Girl™ Barbie® (My suit was like, totally brown, and hers was like, totally black. And she totally has bangs. I so *totally* did not look like her...).

My dry sense of humor is what makes my posts mildly entertaining. I just didn't realize that it had reached a level where it was parched beyond recognition as humor. But based on the seriousness of some of the responses I have been getting, apparently it has. I assure you, I am not melodramatic enough to be actually offended by being called compassionate.

So I just wanted to make sure that everyone who was reading my journal actually realized that I'm generally not entirely serious when I post (although I *do* generally believe the gist of what I say). I don't necessarily believe in "magical-statistics-gnomes" inside the OkCupid computers. And while I *am* obsessed with gummi bears, I do occasionally eat real foods. And I (mostly) realize that I will never be a ballerina-astronaut (or Noam Chomsky) when I grow up. And I don't actually think science is my religion.

Also, for those of you who read my journal regularly, you may be interested to know that I turned down the Bausch & Lomb, Sr. Programmer/Analyst job. I accepted the other offer which I'm not actually going to give you details about. If I gave you details, then you would know where I work and you could hunt me down and that would be creepy. So at this point all I can say is that I am neither a ballerina-astronaut nor Noam Chomsky. *Sigh*

My sister (theartist formerly known as triangle_girl) says that my journal is"based on real life" the way that lifetime movies are. I'm notentirely sure how she knows about lifetime movies. She has a 12" TVthat she got off craigslist for $5. It has rabbit ear antennae andgets five somewhat fuzzy channels. Lifetime television for women isdefinitely not one of them. And if it were, I would like tothink she wouldn't watch it. In fact, I highly doubt she hasever actually watched an entire lifetime movie.

When she wants to watch TV she comes over to my house (sixhouses away). I have a much bigger, nicer TV. And my antenna is onthe roof so although I get the same five channels that she does,they are much clearer at my house. I also have a DVR to recordthese 5 channels. DVRs are cool because you can fast-forward thecommercials. Commercials are icky (except the ones for Rozerem. IfI ever need a sleep aid, I am totally going to useRozerem, because my prescription drug decisions should be madecompletely based on commercials featuring our 16th president, anastronaut and a beaver...).

Anyways, that was not the point of this rant. The point was that(according to my sister) the veracity of my journal is similar tothat of a lifetime move. I occasionally embellish the truth becauseit is much more interesting that way. I don't outright lie, but twodays ago when I said that creepy guys scared my sister away, thereality was that she mostly got bored with OkCupid. You guys justweren't entertaining enough (although there was this guy that waspretty creepy...). And while my sister's hair is slightly unkempt,calling it "a cross between a fiery tumbleweed and an electrocutedhamster" may have been a bit harsh. And on the 25th when I saidthat it was possible my research would accomplish evil things, Iwasn't actually worried that my research would accomplish evilthings. In fact, I find it highly unlikely (but possible). Andyesterday when I wrote a post "complaining" that OkCupid hadlabeled me as "pure" and "compassionate", I didn't really need yourreassurance that "I don't think anyone takes the icons seriously".And Saturday when I posted concern because one of my acquaintancescalled me, Career Girl™ Barbie®, I wasn't actually worried that Iresembled Career Girl™ Barbie® (My suit was like, totallybrown, and hers was like, totally black. And shetotally has bangs. I so *totally* did not look likeher...).

My dry sense of humor is what makes my posts mildlyentertaining. I just didn't realize that it had reached a levelwhere it was parched beyond recognition as humor. But based on theseriousness of some of the responses I have been getting,apparently it has. I assure you, I am not melodramatic enough to beactually offended by being called compassionate.

So I just wanted to make sure that everyone who was reading myjournal actually realized that I'm generally not entirely seriouswhen I post (although I *do* generally believe the gist of what Isay). I don't necessarily believe in"magical-statistics-gnomes" inside the OkCupid computers. And whileI *am* obsessed with gummi bears, I do occasionally eat real foods.And I (mostly) realize that I will never be a ballerina-astronaut(or Noam Chomsky) when I grow up. And I don't actually thinkscience is my religion.

Also, for those of you who read my journal regularly, you may beinterested to know that I turned down the Bausch & Lomb, Sr.Programmer/Analyst job. I accepted the other offer which I'm notactually going to give you details about. If I gave you details,then you would know where I work and you could hunt me down andthat would be creepy. So at this point all I can say is that I amneither a ballerina-astronaut nor Noam Chomsky. *Sigh*

You took my journal seriously. It made me sad.
An image of 80sMarathon You've learned the cold, hard truth that very few people active on the Internet actually have a sense of humor, particularly the people on dating sites.

80sMarathon commented on

An image of RalphSink This is very good fun (you know, the funny parts) so I need to add you to my favorites so that maybe one day I will remember to come look at your journal again.

RalphSink commented on

An image of blackpaladin Thank you. You have personally destroyed my faith in OKCupid's magical statistics gnomes. My life is now devoid of meaning; I hope you're pleased with yourself. The fact that I might have to add a smiley to the previous statement so as to prevent anyone from assuming I'm being serious and am actually angry with you only further proves your point.

blackpaladin commented on

An image of n8mg Next you'll be telling all of us there is no Santa Claus. Marathon - I'm choosing to believe that your comment is comedy gold, but I'm really not so sure.

n8mg commented on

An image of mcwho Removing to an ironic distance to explain that one is at an ironic distance should thoroughly confuse the ones who take things too literally, and then maybe they'll stop commenting.

What? Everything in a journal is not heartfelt and the absolute literal truth? My illusions are destroyed forever.

mcwho commented on

An image of Diacritic You have just completely shattered my paradigm. My rock-solid belief in the objective truth of your journal was all I had left.

Ah, well. Nihilism it is, then!

Diacritic commented on

An image of nahgems Diacritic: You used the word "paradigm". You have clearly read "What Color is my Parachute?" and/or "The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People" way too many times. If you had used it in a sentence with synergize it might have made my head explode.

nahgems commented on

An image of nahgems This is very good fun (you know, the funny parts) so I need to add you to my favorites so that maybe one day I will remember to come look at your journal again.

Sure. The one time I write something serious, you guys find it funny. Argh!

nahgems commented on

An image of Diacritic Is "none" too many times? I'm just a fan of Kuhn.

Diacritic commented on

An image of nahgems Diacritic: In that case, I suppose it is ok. Kuhn makes me smile.

nahgems commented on

An image of harpy61 I'm with Diacritic- why read all those crappy self-help books when you can go to the original?

harpy61 commented on

An image of sandgate Noam? is that you? I don't believe it. It's really you. isn't it?

sandgate commented on

An image of Diacritic Why does your astronaut suit have that tutu built into it, Noam?

Diacritic commented on

An image of nahgems If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion. - NC

The question is why doesn't your astronaut suit have a tutu built in, Diacritic?

nahgems commented on

I met Herr Chomsky once. He was spattered with grease, had a bratwurst in each hand, and reeked of sauerkraut- but as one of the few people I personally know who actually like sauerkraut, it was okay. We talked about pickled cabbage and the unthinking majority for at least an hour. True story- but not really. Not even remotely. I'm made of candy and lies, but mostly lies. Except when I'm being honest, which is most of the time, 'cause I usually don't volunteer information. This is another way of saying that while a question put to me will almost certainly get you either a candid and honest answer or a snorted, incredulous refusal to answer, if I just start talking or tell you a story it is far less likely that I'm being entirely truthful. Autism pushes me to be literal and honest, sure, but I got that from my mother's side. I also happen to have inherited my Scandinavian father's deep-seated love of tall tales and bullshit. (I'm reasonably certain that my father, as 3/4 Dane and 1/4 Swede, is descended entirely from skalds. Lying skalds.)

A former user commented on

An image of Diacritic Because I'm not a ballerina, Mr. Chomsky.

I'm Career Girl™ Barbie®.

Diacritic commented on

An image of SpicyLunch Having a profile with almost no text and deleting one's pictures may lead to an unsatisfying okcupid stay. Unless rejecting dating before it can reject a person is a lifetime intent.

SpicyLunch commented on

An image of monkeyXplosion Career Girl™ Chomsky®, with professional space suit and out-on-the-town tutu!

monkeyXplosion commented on

An image of nahgems Yay! Career Girl™ Chomsky® can have a cool repetoir of phrases just like Teen Talk™ Barbie® did: "I like shopping", "Math is hard", "Will we ever have enough clothes?", and "Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever."

nahgems commented on

An image of Diacritic "Like, colorless green ideas totally sleep furiously!"

Diacritic commented on

An image of onehalfspin Wait, nahgems, were you embellishing the truth when you said that you often embellish the truth in your journals? So that means you don't really? *Head asplodes*

onehalfspin commented on

An image of XeroNein A joke explained is a joke undone.

XeroNein commented on

An image of SpicyLunch Aviva Chomsky as Skipper.

SpicyLunch commented on

Hahaha. "See, I hung him upside down! That way, their little piranha frowns are smiles!"

A former user commented on