Find better matches with our advanced matching system
nahgems
30 / F / Straight / Married
East Rochester, New York
Her journal posts
You scared my sister away...
Me: I don't know what to call you in my OkCupid journalAt this point I went downstairs. When I returned she handed me a piece of paper. From this point on, she will be referred to as
Her: You could refer to me as "my sister"
Me: That is lame. I think from this point on I will refer to you as, "The artist formerly known as triangle_girl"
Her: What is my symbol?
Me: I don't know. If it was a well known symbol I wouldn't be calling it "the artist formerly known as triangle_girl", I would call it as an "Exclamation Point" (or whatever its actual name was)
Her: Oh. But I want to know what my symbol is
On a completely unrelated note, I got an OkCupid email today that said, "hi how r u ........where u from". I rarely complain about the vast quantity of idiotic OkCupid emails I get. I've gotten used to the lame one line emails by now. I disabled "woos" - so I don't have to deal with them**. But seriously, OkCupid posts my location information in about 4 billion places. If you are going to send me a lame one-line email, at least ask something interesting that isn't posted in bold letters in 4 billion different places. Ask me if I prefer crunchy peanut butter or smooth peanut butter. Ask me why I think that belgian malinois are the absolute most perfect dog in the world. Ask me who would win in a fight, an alligator with a laser or a python with a .357 magnum. Ask me anything that even a (slightly literate) spastic gerbil on acid wouldn't already be able to figure out.
** Except for the occasional person who circumvents the "disable woos" feature and sends me an email with message "woo" and nothing else. WTF? I disabled "woos" because I didn't want to get silly messages that didn't say anything. Do you think I am going to find it cute or innovative or something?
aeropagitica commented on
yogfthagen commented on
nahgems commented on
Reserved straight women especially will do better if they prepare themselves for online dating, as dating in general brings out the best in humanity and the worst like netspeak, spammed genital pictures, and form letter proposals of marriage. It should be possible to make some kind of profile that doesn't leave one feeling vulnerable, and then you can still meet people.
SpicyLunch commented on
A former user commented on
nahgems commented on
The spectators.
Diacritic commented on
I do agree, though, that whether we be smarter or dumber than average, all of us regular users are VERY easily amused....
A former user commented on
velander commented on
Maurog_Dark commented on
yogfthagen wrote: Besides, the shotgun method has better odds of working than hand-crafted, individually targeted emails.
Tell me about it, pft. I'd think with all the hand-crafted, individually-targeted emails I've sent out, I'd get at least one person kind enough to write back, even if only to say "Bug off ya geek!" :P
velander wrote: Why not save your time and just stick to spamming everyone on craigslist?
The sad part about that is that most posts on craigslist are spammers themselves. Typically stating that if you really want to speak to them, you have to go register with some other lame dating site, only to find out the profile they mentioned doesn't even exist. Not that spamming the spammers has its benefits, but it's better to do that via postal mail by mailing them pieces of sheet metal back in their own pre-paid envelopes.
veqhturi commented on
If that's your experience, you're doing it wrong. ;)
NuttyIrishman commented on
Oh, and crunchy peanut butter is awful. But then again, I hate peanuts, so ymmv.
A former user commented on
Diacritic commented on
second_phoenix commented on
king_linus commented on
pallid67 commented on
nahgems: welcome to the frustrating, ephemeral world of the social world-wide-web. One of the few places where people who you thought you had developed some sort of relationship with, regularly disappear into thin air at a moment's notice, and there is almost no way to find them ever again.
My advice to king_linus and others is to obtain real physical details on anyone you feel like you're becoming close to online, before something accidental or intentional occurs that makes them go "poof" without a trace or a forwarding address.
sfguyyy commented on
nahgems commented on
Secondly, if I invest time in a relationship with someone, I expect the courtesy of some degree of respect for the time/energy I invest, and if a person gives the impression that they are socially close to me, I hope I can take that at face value, rather than have to think in the back of my mind that they will just turn around and leave at a moment's notice. If I decided to marry someone, for example, I wouldn't consider it particularly sociable for that person to disappear without notice and without a trace one day, unless I was abusing them somehow and/or making it difficult for them to communicate with me.
Relationships that are strictly online probably only rarely reach the degree of committment/seriousness of "marriage", but it's still annoying to become attached to someone, only to have them disappear without notice and without a trace.
I am not for a minute suggesting that one should "stalk" someone who has no interest in remaining in contact - but there are far better ways of managing one's personal relationships than simply disappearing from sight at the drop of a hat. My suggestion was mostly targeted to situations where the other person might carelessly "leave no forwarding address", and also as a way of ascertaining whether a person is being real and sincere in their interest in us (and thus presumably willing to provide personal details) or just using us as online "avatar-like" playthings that they have no intention of making "real" friends. Personally, I tend to steer FAR away from the latter types, and asking for more personal details is one way to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.
sfguyyy commented on
A former user commented on
Nah, sfguyyy, that's just a first-order fallacy. People don't use the word all that often, they just use it all the time in your presence.
Diacritic commented on
MidDayCrisis commented on
sfguyyy commented on
A former user commented on