Global warming, lunch, or your next vacation… it’s all fair game.
Disclaimer: This section is changed very frequently. Everything I
write is supposition and therefore Science Fiction. It's all based
off of boolean logic styled thinking where I haven't actually ran
truth tables yet.
Religion, philosophy(Ethics), and scientific theory connecting to
religion. (Ie: The afterlife, the soul, the beginning of
Existence(Somethingness, matter/anti-matter) and
Matter(1) and Anti-Matter(-1).
Anti-Matter is the amount of matter necessary to destroy all the
Matter that exists in the Universe.
Matter and Anti-Matter eternally exist to facilitate the definition
of Existence and Non-existence(equilibrium/Nothingness.)
0 = Nothingness = The Void = When anti-matter(-1) and(+) matter(1)
are at(=) infinite/eternal equilibrium(0).
The opposite(-) of Nothingness(0) = Opposite(-) of anti-matter(-1)
and(+) matter(1) = 0. (because -(-1 +1) = -1(-1 +1) = 1 - 1 =
The opposite of eternal equilibrium of
anti-matter+matter(Nothingness) is eternal non-equilibrium(infinite
anti-matter, and infinite matter) but if both remain infinitely
increasing, anytime their rate of increase is the same they define
Nothingness again. (Come full circle.)
So anytime we can observe matter or anti-matter, they aren't at
equilibrium, and one is more present than the other by a
qualitative(in the case where quality = quantity) amount
SHAPE OF THE UNIVERSE (Buddhism Samkhara Dukkha)
Basically our existence(our Universe) is infinite Dimension of an
Infinity sign, where a 2D Universe/Infinity Sign exists in every
possible reality, and time follows the same pattern, and everything
intersects at Nothingness, like the smallest possible form
existence approaching 0, existing at the center of the
Another way to describe the shape of the Universe is sine, cosine,
and tangent lines representing one possibility in everything that
has a definition and an undefinition(center, origin, equilibrium,
and ending) extending out in every possible direction from origin,
and going into its inverse direction infinitely and repeating,
becoming Undefined as the outer asymptote before it curves back
into towards the center of Nothingness again. It's Infinity to the
Infinity Power. (and Infinity to the negative Infinity Power) We
are constantly a flux of matter and anti-matter reaching
equilibrium and then infinitely not reaching equilibrium toward a
hyperbole/asymptote, and coming full circle before not-existing
The nature of subatomic existence is to prove existence by in one
moment, existing, and in one moment, not existing, and having to do
this at different points in space and in time to facilitate the
infinite progression of non-equilibrium and and equilibrium.
(Basically Nothingness and Existence infinitely define one another,
over and over, through the fluctuation of anti-matter and
Reality is the net chain of events that follow rules of causality.
Everything that could've happened, didn't, because it already
'tried to,' and our observation/attempt at understanding Reality is
our attempt to understand why Fate is Predestined, or why we
already made the choice. (The Oracle, Matrix II.) There's the
beginning of logic, and the end of logic, and our attempt to
understand all the attempts in between, is the inevitable
experience of all causality from the beginning of
existence/nonexistence. Our reality, is what actually succeeds out
of all instances. Though, one could theorize that there are other
realities that are intangible to our senses, but able to be
imagined by our analytical mind. If there are an infinite amount of
realities, then there has to be an absolute negative/inverse
reality to this reality, so that an equilibrium of the two
realities and their time/anti-time can also be defined as Nothing.
(To affirm the definition of existence in the first place)
RANDOMNESS (Choice/Free Will is an illusion between those with
power, and those without: Merovingian, Matrix II)
Entropy and true Randomness is an illusion: Things seem random
because they could've took any infinite number of events, and for
some reason of circumstance, in our reality they took this
particular chain of events. Whenever we observe the universe to
apply a fact or observation, it's basically taking a picture of the
Universe out of all instances through time and space.
Funnily enough, a computer generates randomness using time, and the
instant you press that button, it uses its internal clock to start
the generation of a number that is seemingly unrelated to the
internal system clock's time at the very moment, but really the
'random' number generated had to follow the laws of causality to
reach the result at which it currently is. (not truly
Just like when you're at a slot machine, same thing. Reality is
moving too fast for your senses to control when to achieve a
desired picture of the Universe. You take a picture and you find it
very hard to get that same 'picture' again, therefore, there's an
illusion of randomness.
I'm not someone that likes to believes in fate, because I love the
illusion of free will, but with enough boolean logic, it could be
argued that all the realities of our Universe represent fate, and
that this reality is just one possible fate. Therefore, our
actions(thoughts are actions) -are- predetermined in THIS reality.
Fate -has- to be predetermined just for this reality to be assured
that it can remain defined forever against all other realities. In
fact, if randomness is truly an illusion, that only further
supports the argument that fate is true.
Moving across realities might be possible, but I don't know if it's
humanly possible, that is, I don't know if pure thought could
enable a human being to exist as they are in this reality, in
another reality. (even if it's only offset by the smallest measure
of time possible of existence and non-existence.)
Time is basically all realities existing all the time. That is to
say, me writing this message right now, exists in all realities,
and in one reality, it completely never exists. Time, is also
eternal. Right now there's a reality where I'm writing this message
a second earlier and a second later, for instance. Right now
there's a reality that's 30 years from now, that THIS reality
slowly becomes, while that 30 years from now reality, is eternally
offset from us by that 30 years.
Anti-time must exist, for absolute zero to be observable.
Anti-time doesn't have to be necessarily observable by our senses,
but imaginable by our analytical mind. If our mind can't possibly
conceptualize it, it might be Undefinable/The nonexistence of
analysis. Nonsense is already nothing to sensory.
So there's a reality that's -30 years from now, just as there's a
reality of -infinity years from now, uncreating the definition of
existence and nonexistence, while time recreates it, infinitely.
Time too, is an infinity sign to the infinity power and infinity
sign to the inverse infinity.
Resentment(-1) is the wish to punish.
Opposite of resentment(1) is the not wish to punish.
The not wish to punish is = the wish to forgive(1).
To forgive(1) is to cease resentment(-1).
Forgiveness(1) + Resentment(-1) = 0(nothing, nonsense to the
sensory, undefined to the analytical)
Infinite Resentment = Infinite Punishment. (Hell, Devil)
Infinite Forgiveness = Infinite Love. (Heaven, God)
Earth/Reality = Fluctuations of resentment and forgiveness. (and
Therefore, the only unforgivable sin is to cause a contradiction to
If God and Heaven are always forgiving, upon death if you believe
the contradiction to that definition, and the definition is never
changing(absolute truth), thus clinging to the definition is not a
dukkha, or suffering, you are in a sense infinitely resenting upon
death. (That's your last thought, and until your brain waves die
out, its going to 'seem' infinite/eternal) because when we die, it
may be possible our brain is capable of better feeling the reality
of smaller intervals of time. (infinite division towards 0 time) so
it feels like an eternity of that emotion or thought.
In other words, to resent reality or the truth, is to reject
reality, and to reject reality, is a dukkha or sufference. It's a
punishment. And if you eternally reject reality, you are eternally
punishing yourself. (Hell)
Sometimes Knowledge = Power = The greater aptitude to Love and
To accept knowledge is to forgive knowledge, or, you don't
resent/reject knowledge. The more knowledge you can accept and
forgive, the more you are practicing infinite love. Once you can
attain infinite love, you must therefore have forgiven infinite
knowledge. Once you obtain infinite knowledge, you are by
definition, all knowing. You can only become all knowing by being
God, or, In Heaven with God.
PROOF OF A SUPREME BEING
Division in Mathematics might be representative of
sensory/analytical mind presence. 0 sensory can be divided by 1
analytical, and we can conceptualize 0(because analytical still
exists). But when there's 0 analytical/reason, with 1 sensory, then
the mind lacks the ability to define or conceptualize anything that
is beyond is senses. (any of them, not just the five that humans
Is there only 5 senses just because we only have 5? What if there
was another sense that these 5 senses cannot commune/sense? Does a
sense have to commune with other senses to be a sense? No,
otherwise, something that only smells or hears, wouldn't be allowed
to consider those senses by definition. The only sense that all
senses refer to is the sense of touch, because it is bound by
causality. The nervous system's connection to the reactive and
analytical mind. You have to have a sense of touch to create
definition/undefinition or thought and anti-thought, thought
defining itself against unthought.
Therefore, the fact that I can type this message right now affirms
existence and non-existence, and therefore affirms that in the very
beginning, an analytical mind had to be present to define Existence
and Non-Existence, and the very end of existence is when the
analytical mind is not present, and Undefinition happens so
Definition can reoccur and consequently define what is Eternity and
One could argue, we are someone's imagination. God's imagination.
He is an author. I love that show Supernatural for this
One could argue, writers play God, or actually, are God and their
stories are, in some way, possibly a reality as long as there are
no contradiction to definition. (Then again, the only thing that
could create a Contradiction would have to be the author/God)
JESUS WAS DIVINE BY DEFINITION
If the only thing that can create a contradiction is the author,
then Jesus was created by God, or Divine, by definition.
By Definition, Jesus was born from a woman who was born without the
punishment of original sin. (Bearing children and no longer being
immortal as a result of that ability.)
Mary wasn't immortal, but she was barren. She simply couldn't have
children. But suddenly, a contradiction occurred to that
definition. She had a child, and if his existence is proven, and
her barren is proven, then His Divinity, is subsequently
Even if we suppose Mary wasn't barren, by definition a virgin is
someone who cannot possibly get pregnant, and to do so would
contradict the definition. Either way, Jesus is divine by
definition. Anything bound by the laws of the reality cannot create
the contradiction, and instead that is seen as resentment/rejection
There's Knowledge/Truth(1), and Anti-Knowledge/Lie(-1)
Knowledge + Anti-Knowledge = Nothing(0) No knowledge is gained, no
knowledge is lost.
If knowledge is ever changing, at some point some knowledge is
proven to be a lie, and at some point, that lie can become the
truth. The world is round. That is a truth we know. But if you go
back in time far enough, that truth becomes a lie (to the reality
of those that believe the lie.)
Knowledge is always changing. Animals live, and die, and are
sometimes observed to not exist at all. True knowledge defines what
can be known either sensory or analytically to eternally be true
and eternally be false(anti-knowledge) across all instances of
reality. One absolute truth might be that everything that has a
beginning, has to have an end. (Matrix 3)
In other words, there has to be knowledge that changes, and
knowledge that doesn't change.
PROOF JESUS EXISTED:
For an author to create a contradiction to a definition, or an
absolute truth, is a selfless act. It is lying, and resenting the
current state of reality. To define a selfless act, it has to be
proven to exist and proven to not exist. So God was burdened to
commit a selfless act if no one else could. If God creates the
first selfless act, then any other selfless acts are thus a result
of God's selfless act. (Jesus = selfless = God = Jesus)
Firstly to define a contradiction, God would have to commit one to
prove it can exist to define it's non-existence. So he was burdened
by law causality to commit a contradiction at least once. In fact,
if God or a Supreme Being is Perfect, he -has- to commit a selfless
act, to prove the definition of perfection and non perfection just
To eternally punish oneself is a selfless act for the sake of
others. God had to create a contradiction in reality (Man born from
Woman who was not fertile, spontaneous cloning) to define what
existence normally is. (Non spontaneous cloning.)
Furthermore, creating Jesus Christ was a selfless act so that God
could commit a Sin, and therefore forgive Man for committing sin.
Jesus Christ's death was God's proof that has always loved man,
loves man now, and will continue to love man. Yahweh (Yova) was
said to mean "I am what I am." IN ALL tenses.
Lastly, the Big Bang, or something from nothing, to create the very
first definition, can be considered, a selfless act. It's a
contradiction, you can't get something from nothing. Committing
this contradiction allows existence in the first place.
PROOF THE DEVIL EXISTS
God had to define love by defining hate, and its practice and its
master. Therefore, God had to create the contradiction of Unity in
Heaven, the selfless act giving rise to Lucifer. God forgave
Lucifer, But Lucifer committed the selfless act of committing a
contradiction of believing God couldn't practice the forgiveness.
That God was incapable of practicing perfect love. (Which, he has
to, and he has to practice imperfection to define them.) Since God
is all knowing, he creates Lucifer even knowing ahead of time of
the betrayal. Does that sounds familiar about any Messiah?
WHAT's (|!POSSIBLE|, ~!Possible, 0, ~Possible, |POSSIBLE|)
In order to define what is always impossible, we must define, what
is always possible.
The closer something is to impossible (-), the more contradictory
it is to the possible.
Diction/Define, Contradiction/Anti-Define, Equilibrium of Diction +
Anti-Diction = Undefined/NonExistence/Nothing, Non-Equilibrium of
Diction + Anti-Diction = Always Defined/Always/Existing/Always
Infinite = Equilibrium again = Nothing.
The more God is proven to be impossible, so too must he be proven
more possible in another reality, just to have
The basis of conceptualization/diction/definition/existence is to
prove it can also not exist at least in one reality. Therefore, to
escape the laws of delusion/contradiction/lie, while being bound by
them, one would then have to not be bound by them to start
existence/nonexistence diction, and at some point, the Universe and
all reality becomes Undefined as Time and Anti-Time infinitely
Since Time and Anti-Time can't be 0 while passing (or else time
would be standing still in that reality) then they're in constant
flux forward/backward across all realities until not being in
The Boeing 747 in the Backyard assembled by a Tornado is making
many different realities, at once. Many different suppositions, at
once, but for each supposition(reality) is an
anti-supposition(anti-reality.) Just because each supposition makes
the net reality more improbable, doesn't mean it's not also more
probable until possible/and impossible are infinitely at
equilibrium. The more you suppose, you're infinitely approaching
the equilibrium of the more you cannot suppose, until something is
proven as both possible in one reality and impossible in another
reality, and when at equal quantity of matter/anti-matter
time/anti-time existence/anti-existence, equate to Nothing.
At the end of the day, of we can't sense something, we have to
conceptualize it and its non-conceptualization (Define, Undefine.)
Even conceptualization must have non conceptualization just for us
to define it.
The ultimate truth that seems apply across all attempts at
diction/contradiction is that you need a quality (-, +), and a
quantity(-inf, inf) and when they're both equal, you have
Is there an instance where the 'ultimate truth' of needing a -, a
+, and both the possibility and impossibility of their equilibrium
in any reality(imaginative or real) cannot apply to a concept you
Is it true that they represent anti-matter and matter,
contradiction and diction, and that the larger they
get, the more they stand a chance to create Nothingness?
The heads look like the holes surrounded by the infinite increase
of matter/anti-matter, perhaps simulating a black hole/white hole,
where something becomes infinitely heavy before becoming Nothing,
and visa-versa in the anti-reality of that.
The tails look like as anti-matter/matter infinitely decrease, once
they're the same they create 0/0, or
Undefinition (The edges of the circle, where something cannot be
So Yin and Yang are a 2D representation of the Universe, too,
except it lacks the ability to properly show recursion in each of
the spheres of Nothingness. Technically a black hole and white hole
a Anti-Recursion and Recursion, which is a picture of the whole
Universe again. (Yin Yang inside Yin Yang inside Yin Yang
The more I think about the concept of -, 0, +, the more viral it
becomes. (applying to as many concepts/definitions I can think of.)
You have to keep asking why to keep reducing the concept/definition
down to its basis.
If you ever find yourself disagreeing with a diction, ask yourself
why? Keep asking yourself why, going back and forth between (-) and
(+) and then you might reach an equilibrium of a reality of
If I offend you by typing this word out, is it written that I
cannot type this word out, or that I cannot speak it? Or that I
cannot intone it in my mind? In one reality, all of these are true,
and in another reality, none of these are true. Which reality do
you want to be in? Do you really have a choice?
Does the word YOVA in phoenician letters indicate anything by
resembling anything in the Greek alphabet?
Jehova is like Yahweh(which is pronounced Yova)
Y is the 2nd to last letter in Phonetic, which could be
You(Anti-Self, -1), as if intoning to Everyone
else rather than Self(1). Thus, Y means You(anti-self), and
Me(Self), or Existence/Nonexistence =.
O is Omega in Greek (END)
V is the 5th letter from the end of the Phonetic, but is also the
OR(disjunction) of two things. (So it's
one or the other, because the JUNCTION would be Nothing.)
W would be the right letter for V, despite the pronunciation, W
could signify (With), JUNCTION, It's two
V's, so it's countering that Anti JUNCTION(V).
A is the first letter in Phonetic and is like Alpha in Greek
Y(Existence/Nonexistence =)O(END) V/W(AND/OR) A(BEGINNING).
The name is always supposed to intone the definition of
END/0/BEGINNING and its opposite. It's another
pronunciation of Infinity V/W Anti-Infinity.
I promise you my life is not the sequel to the Number 23, but
funnily enough 2nd to last letter in
Phonetic, 5th letter from the end of the Phonetic, 5-3 = 2, 5-2 =
3. 23 Chromosomes.
And funnily enough, if anyone(Me, anti-Me) wanted my life to be the
sequel to the Number 23, in some reality that has/will/can
BELIEF/PROOF, TELEKINESIS, MIND CONTROL
Proof(+)/Truth = quality of analytical mind
Anti-Proof(-)/Lie = quality of anti-analytical mind
The more analytical minds that believe the lie, the more it becomes
the truth. The stronger the analytical mind, the stronger the
So if one mind increases in analysis, it can increase the lie (or
the truth, or both to some extent.)
The more analytical minds that believe the lie, the more it becomes
In theory, if everyone just believed the lie that telekinesis were
possible, it would thus, be possible in that reality.
The more I can prove(truth) telekinesis were possible by
exhibiting/manifesting it(sensory, tangible reality), then everyone
would start to believe the lie(or the truth.)
Truth is (+) -Inf^-Inf &&/|| Inf^Inf : Sensory Mind
Lie is (-) -Inf^-Inf &&/|| Inf^Inf : Analytical Mind
The more Truth/Proof you have for a concept/definition for Sensory
Mind, the more it exists in that reality.
You can proof it to analytical mind all you want without Sensory
Mind, but if 0 senses can observe the definition of
Telekinesis/Mind Control, then it is Nonsensical/Intangible. In
other words the analytical mind has the burden of Proof(+) to a
non-zero Sensory Mind for 1 Definition and 1 Anti-Definition to
Since all senses are derived from a nervous system (touch), Touch
is the base of all senses and is the chief one to satisfy with
proof for tangibility.
"Prove that I can touch telekinesis for it to be true."
Anti-Matter would by definition in this reality, have to be
intangible since tangibility is positive quality. If Anti-matter
were observable by the 5 senses, it would be a (-), or a lie,
turning the sense into an anti-sense. Anti-sense is the destruction
of senses. The destruction of the nervous system is
anti-tangibility. The more you can't feel, the more you're
approaching 0 senses or intangibility. Lacking all five senses
completely while just having an analytical mind presence would then
have to prove it's own existence with a thought after nonexisting,
and that would mean you're assuming the Author of this reality's,
ANKH, CRUCIFIX, FLUX CAPACITOR, THETA(N), LIBRA(SCALES)
All three can be rationalized to represent the nature of the
Universe in some 2, or 3D way.
The head of the ankh could possibly represent infinity, and the
three arms represent anti infinity. So too, could the crucifix
represent this, but, more than likely represents the top side of
the Universe as everything flows into Nothingness, and the Full
Circle is that the Undefined are the edges of the Cross/Ankh.
The Flux Capacitor was also a 3D sculpture of the Nature of the
A sphere with the smallest hollow hole in the very nucleus of a
sphere would be a representation, and it would also only be known
to its creator or whomsoever saw its creation before they lack the
ability to sense it with their five senses. Technically, any and
all spheres represent this, because atomically the very center of
its matter is going to have one atom, and subatomic existence
[quote=WikiScientology]The thetan is the true identity of a person
– an intrinsically good, omniscient, non-material core capable of
Theta is supposed to represent the Universe then, if it's positive
matter and Nothingness within, and Undefined on the edges.
The impossible triangles are an attempted 3D representation of
Infinity and Anti-Infinity.
The Libra/Scale is a representation of the Universe.
Magnets are a representation of the Universe.
EM FIELDS, TELEKINESIS (again, sorry)
Electromagnetic fields possibly? If so, can we touch them? Can we
alter them with a thought? Is that telekinesis? We know they're
there. We were told so. Most of us believe it, because we either
seen the proof empirically on instruments, or took it for
Electromagnetic fields are known to cause allergic reactions in
some people, and it's unexplainable. So basically the human body is
capable of detecting these fields to some extent, and proximity
(attraction, +) increases that sense and tangibility. Technically
we might be able to move things without touching them in one
reality. Is it this reality? By definition, if all realities get to
occupy a definition at least some point in time, then it is, this
reality. We just don't know when. I wonder(and could be certain)
there's a reality where I learn to let go of my fear of giant
spiders in time in the instance they could exist and be massive,
while I'm alive.
COINCIDENCE/LUCK OR/AND ANTI COINCIDENCE/LUCK (FATE)
That randomly appeared on my notepad when I rolled over on my
keyboard hours before typing this message. I looked at it long
enough and thought that in some reality, it could be rationalised
to mean something.
Here, !hereInfinity, !0 END(0) Infinity
And then we come back to Belief, !Belief. Since I have no
physical/tangible evidence, I cannot satisfy the burden of proof to
the senses for you to believe. You simply have to take my word for
it, and imagine that in one reality, I'm telling the truth.
ONE TRUTH THAT COUNTS TOWARDS ANYTHING POSSIBLE ARGUMENT
The more observable occurrences there are of dreams becoming
reality, the more knowledge is gained.
In one reality, no one thought of Hoverboards.
In another reality, no one thought Hoverboards could exist.
In another reality, no one thought Hoverboards could be
In another reality, no one thought Hoverboards could unexist.
In another reality, no one thought Hoverboards could be
THE ORIGIN OF TIME
The basic nature of time is how much we can feel our existence and
non-existence. There's a Universal
pulse where time divides itself infinitely towards 0, and
everything and every reality must intersect this 0 at some point,
and does so all the time, continuously. We are at a pulse that we
cannot detect with our senses, but our analytical mind has a
reality where it can, and so then it can convince the senses that
there's a reality where IT can. Thus, there is a reality where
anything is possible. And we can lie
ourselves into thinking it is this one, or we can accept all
knowledge as true and truth our way into that reality.
PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT
If the more knowledge and supposition I put out, begins to annoy
you, my be standing a chance to reject the idea. The more you
reject the knowledge I put forth, the more you stand a chance to
hate the knowledge, or even me. You are in effect, helping the
anti-reality of the reality where you would believe
me infinitely, and I would believe me, infinitely. (The
anti-reality, you would infinitely disbelieve/hate me, the
realities in between, you agree/disagree with a few things here and
PROOF THAT I AM WRONG
The fact that I cannot type these messages with my mind yet, means
I am holding onto something. I need my analytical mind to imagine
my unexistence for the smallest fraction of time. People do this to
slow down their heart rate. It's tough, but there are physical
steps in between that you cannot skip without time travel.
HOW TO IMAGINE NOTHINGNESS (-vw vw vw) EMOTION/ANTI-EMOTION
Can you imagine practicing laughter and sincerity at the same time,
by the same quantity?
What about FEELING laughter and sincerity at the same time, without
What about FEELING tired and untired, sleepy, and unsleepy, at the
same time, by the same quantity?
FEELING Love, and Hate, at the same time, by the same
Those would all be practices of equilibrium. How does one feel
equilibrium? How does one think of it? This message right here
proves it's concept. But, how do we FEEL it so our senses are
fooled? Do I have to feel sleepy/unsleepy as infinitely as possible
until they are at equal quantities before I can feel
Nothingness? Should I even attempt to stay up knowing I will die
without sleep? Isn't there a reality where I don't die without
sleep? How do I make that this reality on shear belief and then
Edit: This is feeling like an ongoing journal, if I continue to
record all my thoughts. For instance, from the time I posted this
message to the time I edited it now when I'm typing, I accidentally
put half of what I added in my profile summary. Only I know that in
so far that no one looked at my profile while this occurred. There
is a possibility of people anonymously watching me and knowing of
my reality of making this mistake.