Let's not waste time. If you're not okay with seeing someone in an open relationship then you shouldn't read any further in pursuit of romance and sex.
Other pursuits are still an option though
The world is glorious in both its wonder and absurdity. As much as our contemporary neo-Enlightenment philosophies tend to vilify the human wrought world as "unnatural" and "unhealthy" Nature certainly doesn't have a monopoly on the sublime any more than we have one on the ridiculous.
I'm sure there is nothing like a God, but I'm also equally sure it has a stupendous sense of humor.
The shiny thing the camera is pointed at is, inevitably, quite boring. What lies in the periphery and beyond is less so, but will always disappoint with its insistence on the importance of the center of the frame. It is this tension that gives rise to all meaning, between the emptiness of the subject and the subjugation of any context to that emptiness.
The importance of the above cannot be overstated. Yes, philosophy is gobbledygook, but it is the gobbledygook we must wade through to arrive at the correct question. Philosophy cannot answer that, or any, question, only offer them for perusal.
None of this means you need to read philosophy, or even have heard of any of the philosophers I adore. What it does mean is that you need to have not found a little ledge and convinced yourself it's the world far and wide. Even better if you're falling down the rabbit hole and content with the notion that there really is no bottom.