I have more pics & what not as well.....but I like the veil of anonymity that one is provided from time to time. With who I choose, I have no need for anonymity....but otherwise the shadows are delightful...
*I have recently reached a level of disgust & irritation with the steady stream of 'grammarians' roaming about this site. It is remarkably simple to grasp the following:
1. Grammar is in actuality an arbitrary construct in which the possibilities of Language & language(s) are oppressively interiorized & fixed, primarily so that States/'Nations' could maximize productivity (at the cost of the creative energy whose progeny is 'Language').
2. Functional, normative conversational English has a plethora of grammatically acceptable contractions. This is ostensibly due to the non-necessity &/or negligible-importance of pure 'Formal' language, at all times. If there are vestigial remains of the relatively-recently-imposed (in the known-history of languages) necessity of Formal diction & discourse, it remains specifically in the written word, & certainly not in conversational English. When 'chatting' online, one is entering a sphere of written language whose function, explicitly, is one of conversation, regardless of its mediation through 'writing' as such. Thus, if someone in an 'IM' conversation writes 'convo' or 'ur' instead of 'you're,''you are,' &/or 'your' or 'btw' instead of 'by the way' or 'lol' instead of 'that comment made me chuckle &/or laugh physiologically' or any other myriad of possibilities, it operates as a functional use of contractions within conversational English, not as some arbitrary signifier of intelligence.
Its just pretentious, obnoxious bullshit, frankly, & indicative of either disturbingly reductive thought, or self-inflated importance. Get over yourselves.
I am not interested, in self summation, & reductionism