Find better matches with our advanced matching system
—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy
dgc20e
36 / M / Straight / Seeing someone
New York, New York
His journal posts
Our Redesign is Live
May 10, 2007
We're getting a lot of vitriol and anger about the new design,
which doesn't surprise me. We're also getting more compliments than
the last time we redesigned. What's funny is that on any website,
whenever you redesign, the vast majority of people who care enough
to comment, care in a negative way: meaning they liked the old site
and are frustrated by the change.
I understand that, but as someone who's been using the new site for weeks now, I assure you: once you get used to it, it is WAY better than the old site.
Please bear with us as we work out the bugs and kinks - the site's not perfect in every browser on every computer, but we'll do our best to get it there.
I understand that, but as someone who's been using the new site for weeks now, I assure you: once you get used to it, it is WAY better than the old site.
Please bear with us as we work out the bugs and kinks - the site's not perfect in every browser on every computer, but we'll do our best to get it there.
Typically, I want to identify the speaker before I read a comment and the user pic is my primary method of doing that because it's faster than reading the username, especially if I'm skimming over a long list of comments. (Here I'm referring to the Faves' Comments list, which displays the username at the start of the comment.)
Switching the order of the user info and comment content should be easy to do and I think it would really be an improvement.
Darin_ commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
atropa777 commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
noangel77 commented on May 10, 2007
dgc20e commented on May 10, 2007
crispy_crab commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
lm44 commented on May 10, 2007
70schild commented on May 10, 2007
Maybe users wouldn't be so vitriolic if we had any sense that the site owners give a crap about what we want. In about three years, I have yet to see any evidence of that.
sweetbriar32 commented on May 10, 2007
MissNDesmond commented on May 10, 2007
lm44 commented on May 10, 2007
lm44 commented on May 10, 2007
sweetbriar32 commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
Dgc, you already know how I feel about colours, and I wrote again about the need for a few selectable CSS sheets in Melanarchy's journal, and about the possiblity of user overriding of this in his, and Chris's.
Other than that, and missing friends as a separate category, I like the actual layout change, and am not experiencing any decrease in page loading speed, in Unix and SuSE Linux on my main system. I've yet to see what has changed with the IM app, since I rarely use that, and I have no idea if this will work in Mozilla 1.2 on my old Mac in Mac OS classic :)
Ayamikhan commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
On the other hand, I know that feel-good comments were not useful in getting the bugs out, so I put a brief list of low hanging fruit in melanarchy's journal which I am reposting here:
Close format tags and the end of each comment. If you forget to close a bold/italic tag, it carries down to the next comment and so on to mangle the rest of the page.
Add post titles to the journal browsing page: It would fit nicely in place of "View this post" for posts and "this post" for comments.
Display which page of comments is being viewed: This could be as easy as adding the string Page 4 as the first and last line of the comment page; you don't need to be fancy by mucking with the chooser.
Place author above comment text (not below): That way we can just read from top to bottom. Otherwise the eye pattern is to flick down to who, up to what, farther down to who, back up to what. Very jarring.
Lose the blue boxes behind each comment and replace with a thin double horizontal bar between comments much like the thin single bar between author and comment. This would simultaneously stop me from going blind from poor contrast and save a huge amount of vertical real estate.
Losing the blue boxes will wreck the white border around the thumbnails. Instead of changing the boarder color, double the picture size and wrap the comment around the picture as per the new-user spotlight on the home page.
Alternate fix to the blue-on-blue that will allow you to keep things colorful: Place the author details in a blue box and leave the comment text in black on white just below the author. The blue box will provide both borders (from comment text and from the other comment, provide color, and no extra real estate is used. You can then reduce the margins since color boundaries are effective that way.
D_Vorsay commented on May 10, 2007
D_Vorsay commented on May 10, 2007
harpy61 commented on May 10, 2007
D_Vorsay commented on May 10, 2007
So why are there still so many design faults?
Why DO you keep redesigning? Is there some corporate image or goal you're striving for? Wouldn't you be better off at OkC using your clearly meagre skills to sort out all the known issues that people have been reporting ever since I've been here (a couple of years now)?
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
dgc20e commented on May 10, 2007
If people who can't code at all, and don't understand CSS, are willing to wait, myself and a few others that can code are working on modifications to put the journalCommentInfo above journalCommentText, where most people have said they want it. This will depend on your using Firefox or possibly Mozilla and either installing extensions like Stylish, or directly editing userContent.css.
As for the blue text on blue background, that has already been fixed and explained, both here :
http://www.okcupid.com/journal?tuid=8209294779479156655#10339546724335573551
and here :
http://www.okcupid.com/journal?tuid=17659092069595557416#9455481503815366037
If programming is too difficult for most people to learn it themselves, please try and be more patient and compassionate with those who do it everyday.
Ayamikhan commented on May 10, 2007
A former user commented on May 10, 2007
dgc20e commented on May 11, 2007
That said, my only real complaint is the fact that it now takes two steps to get to friends' - or faves' - comments, which is the most-used feature for many of us. There are other things that I don't like, but I can learn to live with those, even if I may not donate again.
CrackerBob commented on May 11, 2007
dgc20e commented on May 11, 2007
That said, I wasn't really trying to flame you, I'm just trying to explain why we get pissy when y'all make those kind of statements, even when you're really directing them towards someone who may deserve it.
CrackerBob commented on May 11, 2007
crispy_crab commented on May 11, 2007
This seems more like the sort of conversation you ought to be having with your parents, not employees at an internet dating website.
bonefish21 commented on May 11, 2007
bonefish21 commented on May 11, 2007
The only thing such such behavior will likely result in is a very slim likelihood that any OKC employees will even bother to solicit comments in their personal journal, and you will all have to satisfy yourselves with emailing a "comments" address and never knowing if anyone even read what you wrote, or cared.
Nice job, indeed.
dgc20e: Some of us do actually appreciate what you folks at OKC are doing, especially considering we are not paying for it. I have my own wishlist, which I have passed on to OKC, but that does not in my view give me the right to flame the holy crap out of you people.
I also understand that you (like me) are a techie, not a customer-service person with little technical knowledge who is paid to present a perennially happy face to customers who abuse them all day long. Please hang in there, take a break, try not to let it get to you.
Thanks again.
sfguyyy commented on May 11, 2007
Before the change pictures had to be 400x400 or get resized and distorted. Now some of my pictures automatically enlarged pretty big. Don't know why.
Also they say that if you don't show your face as a thumbnail now that they will delete them if they are flagged, so I went to re-thumbnail a pic it didn't show that option.
Not expecting a reply, just reporting. :)
crispy_crab commented on May 13, 2007
You journal so you get comments. Are you an employee or a user when you post?
You patronise us (as other people have commented) and decide to be a spokesperson for the site - *you* **chose** this role for yourself. That's what you do and that's what's being commented on.
A former user commented on May 13, 2007
Remember that "dgc20e" is not here to make nice with people, he is a site administrator. Like many people who enjoy what they do (and are not PR types), he's probably inclined to get a little defensive when people attack his work, especially if they do so without any knowledge of what goes into what he does, and especially when they make unfair vitriolic negative sweeping generalizations. Please consider how you'd feel if someone walked up to your desk at work and told you that everything you spent time doing every day was pathetic.
Now play nice, and maybe if we're lucky, and engage constructively with dgc20e, he will give us some feedback from time-to-time on the perspective from his side of things - and some of us might even learn something.
sfguyyy commented on May 13, 2007
crispy_crab commented on May 17, 2007
crispy_crab commented on Jul 9, 2007
It would be nice if it was a big clearer.
Thanks for reading my suggestion.
crispy_crab commented on Aug 31, 2007