Message Him

Join OkCupid

Find better matches with our advanced matching system

—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy

imdbhuck

28 / M / Straight / Single

南京, China

His Details

Last Online
Today – 9:43pm
Ethnicity
Asian
Height
5′ 10″ (1.78m).
Body Type
Average
Diet
Mostly anything
Smokes
No
Drinks
Not at all
Drugs
Never
Religion
Sign
Libra and it’s fun to think about
Education
Dropped out of college/university
Job
Other
Income
Less than $20,000
Offspring
Might want kids
Pets
Speaks
English (Poorly), Chinese (Okay)

Similar Users

My self-summary
I've been networking for 10 years, only found one good mate ..at here.. but i wouldn't thank okcupid, it was my own luck.. actually it's the commercial internet sites that prevent us from
building relationships.. in the world I propose, everything can be much easier.

I'm too disappointed, frustrated to edit and expand my page .
but it's still worth a read.

I've written a chinese version , of course in a more chinese sense , at the bottom of the page

my new thought is about privacy..in short, privacy is the cancer of our society.. removing privacy will romove all guilt,danger and unhappiness...
it is the key , the premise, to improve the social system and human relationship.
with privacy , nothing will change. don't listen to any male monkey who thinks he can be leader in a world full of secrecy.

part1,summary

the society is full of unfit people.if we remove them,
it will automatically become an advanced one similar to a "communist" society.but the big difference is the communist idealogy promotes we feel sorry for low standard humans or behaviors
we've all seen how miserable communist society goes
communism is secretly promoted by extremely selfish,savage like people,whose goal is to destroy our hope to replace capitalism.

we must build a world that people can enjoy each other in,not tolerate each other..
we should tolerate neither the stupid nor the selfish ones , both are misfits..both are animals.
we shouldn't tolerate anyone that is bad for the society. raise our standard!

we need a sociable and homogenous society,not a society full of violence, corruption,jealousy,addiction,disorders,suffering, loneliness and whining
society won't be a pleasant one unless we get rid of those we don't like.it must consist of people who enjoy and respect one another.
a society is good only if we don't feel sorry for unfit people.. remove all the criminals and the sheeple they use.(also other parasites such as royalty and pope)
put people who are real leaders in control ,who are really interested in improving life for us and who truly want to make a better society.

the world will be much nicer..see those small communities..they work so fine, in the society I'm proposing.. there is even no need for money..

part2,the people

Does David Rockefeller want to kill a billion chinese?

Rumor has it that a ridiculously old man called David Rockefeller has been scheming to have a billion "east asians"
and possibly more people killed because he and other so called "globalists" feel china's huge population is a threat to them.
so he and his fellows are developing new technology that can create artificial earthquake and tsunami... the recent ones were their experiments.

i think that's a piece of complete crap of propaganda. they just want to scare people..
chinese are fools to fall for their tricks. the international crime network (which is in control of all nations on earth)
probably persuaded or forced him, a very stupid, deteriorating old man to be the scapegoat, they put him and a few other people to blame.. thus,they can hide aside and continue abuse us..

1, it can scare, intimidate people,cause endless chaos, fights,conflicts,and arguments. chinese ,quite like every other country's fools will follow whoever that feed their emotional cravings..
meanwhile the members of the crime network will come out and be the leaders of all the action and pretend to be the savior of chinese people...then they can control more over china and japan

2, they can keep promoting their philosophy that encourages people to feel sorry for themselves and other people...
well,my whole page is about why people are the problem, especially the people who can't think well.
and how they manipulate people and use their ignorance and arrogance..
now how can any country in the world now claim they are in shortage of people?? the only thing earth has too many is the people... but some Russians , Japanese, the White Nationalists all claim
that their group of people is not enough. so here I suppose all of them must be part of the network, we are suckers to trust any of them,or let them influence our decisions on life

the unlimited reproduction cause lots of misery on earth,
the overpopulation is NO.1 problem of the world. the world problems are not due to the pollution, the limitation of resource or living space as being hyped..it's people's mind.because the most of the population still live a primitive life that belongs to ten thousand BC.
they are not advanced humans.. today the technology provides us an opportunity to live like in paradise. but human relationships today are worse than they've ever been in all of human history.(we have to tolerate and even live with lousy people we don't like,and we find it hard to find those we can enjoy being together)
human minds have failed to catch up with the development of science..
and i think one of ther reasons is we have been engineered for thousands of years but with different tricks

in the page i've talked much about how the savages of the crime network have been exploiting other humans.
I mentioned in ancient time people all had primitive minds, so it was much easier for them to control, they just promoted class system, they are the superior because they are the kings, queens,aristocrats,or bishops(today they still use the trick sometimes)
but in this modern era, they realize that human evolution is inevitable.so they decide to take over the process, they want to alter the path of it to fit into their purpose,
sure, it can't be back to feudalism, but they can still get involved as much as they can.. the biggest trick they use is to promote "equality"(well i've discussed that issue a lot in the page..)
their intention is to slow down the development of human beings, so they can remain in control. it's been the same group of people for thousands of years .there certainly are internal fights, but they all follow the same rule---- to treat the rest of us like slaves , animals and control every aspect of our life)

since recent hundreds of years, people with less defected ,more advanced minds have been suppressed or killed, related activities have been banned or discouraged
I can't argue we could have evolved into perfection, but sure it could have been much better than we have now, just like circus animals, being titillated every day. you got to realize that the world is full of abuse. there are noble savages manipulating us almost every aspect of our life!

in ancient time, they had a lot of children, but most of them couldn't survive the hard lives.
but today, even though people have far fewer children, the survival rate is incredibly high, that means the most defected , worst behaved children now will grow into adults!
imagine how they can be used by the crime network? the stupid ones can be used as "voters".. and the terrible ones may want to join the crime network!

a nation with less of those people is closer to the paradise, look at sweden or singapore, although the two might be as well under control of the network.
i know today sweden has fallen, but it used to be best living place all around. what i'm trying to say is a world full of stupid people is exactly what they want to see, as the population grows, they will have more and more control over the world..

I'm not sure if it's already too late. my advice is we deal with the people who don't fit in this modern world..whether the criminals or their cheerleaders
and others who can't cope with their stupid emotions and face the reality should be treated as the same or at least shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.
the capacity of earth might be at 1 trillion, but it can be perfect with just 1 billion..

part3,the trick

it's to control,manipulate and dominate, not to destroy.. whoever figured out that must be the biggest monkey genius in history..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvi-xNnloPk
"we've been raised like that" French star speaks out a little truth about the world..

"we've been raised like that"= we've been programmed since our birth..

on the contrary, what have Ahmadinejad said? have he ever said anything intelligent about the world ? any truth that we haven't already known?
he is part of international crime network..
the so called international relation is just a trick, the world is ruled by the same group of disgusting freaks

Pat Robertson is friend with Al Gore off screen..(level 1)
Audrey Hepburn and Marilyn Monroe were promoted by same group of filthy people.(level 2)
David Duke and Eli Wessel are on the payroll of the same diabolic beast.(level 3)

Level 4, don't worry about fileserve or filesonic. it's fully under the control of the music industry, so called movie industry or porn industry...after all, they will eventually pay you to watch those crap...today is january 24,2012, within 3 month everything will be back.. or similar sites will be launched.
the smugglers, the pirates, the invaders, the bootleg dealers,webspace providers.wow..are just their useful idiots..

don't behave like a stupid animal.

I've called animals stupid and described people as just like animals, and I would also consider plants to be lacking intelligence, but I love plants.and even though I don't want animals in my house, I'm not abusive to animals.

even if I consider most people to be incapable of dealing with problems of the society, I'm not rude or abusive to them, and I appreciate many of them....I'm not like the dominant savages that praise people but also abuse them..

somebody is correct that even after removing those disgusting freaks from this planet,
the world would still be full of criminals, drug addicts,perverts,parasites,lunatics and all sorts of other misfits...

part4, the women's mind

nice girls daddy.
http://ak0.okccdn.com/php/load_okc_image.php/images/16/150x150/558x800/324x105/1269x1050/0/4129407351936064107.jpeg

or determined wolverinette
http://ak2.okccdn.com/php/load_okc_image.php/images/16/150x150/558x800/0x53/200x254/0/11532719908540560839.jpeg

will be pissed off or frightened.........................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
........................................................................................................
warning: explicit stuff

be very cautious with women who say she wants to improve the world, deal with the crime or help the society..this is a great lesson i've learned from my recent comeback and general experience..they are nothing but actually the biggest part of the problems themselves. without their huge cravings for following whatever in the dominant positions ,no savages would have risen to power in the first place..

many women behave absolutely like animals or children. animals don't care about their living environment,the dogs would just wag their tails to whoever offers them meat ..the infants would call any woman who nurses them mummy.. the kids would smile at or even dream to move up to those family who buy them toys...
some women behave almost identically.. they'd follow anyone who can privide them concubine fantasy....

many women are attracted to such con artists who help each other get into positions of influence, the women would like to flirt their fantasy on politics,economy,culture,society with them ..I don 't think they really care about me or you or the society...they simply want to associate with the dominant savages...there is growing negative attitude toward them.. so their leaders announce "let's deal with the world problems, get rid of our enemies" ----those males who see through their simple tricks .... the women are tricked into believing they have the rights to do anything, but they are actually being extremely abused, manipulated, fucked hard by the those "world leaders". using some women's arrogance.

the current wind that let badly behaved ,animal or child like women get involved into serious social issues, is the most detrimental problem to the society. race, culture,, all other issues are nothing by comparison to the problem of the incompetence of women..

it's not about intelligence, women can't make decision no matter how intelligent she is, she is inferior to a stupid male when dealing with issues that require making decision.

women are the best pawns in the network of manipulation, they would doing dirty works for savage males unpaid such as opposing someone really wants to deal with serious issues like me.

since a long time I've found that women are extremely afraid of criticism which also contributes to their vulnerability of being easily controlled.. dishonest men can just praise women, give them emotion candies,tell them what they want to hear.. they also teach women by media that men are sexist, rude or "self centered" to view women in a critical way..
can you see the tricks??? they are brainwashing people into thinking someone is crude,cocky, bigoted,lunatic....if he speaks his mind and expresses his views that are dangerous to the ruling monkeys ..

part5,inequality

"the censored paragraph on race"
well, this paragraph has been deleted by someone,a company monitor or an internet thought cop...who knows.i can't remember the details i wrote. I talked about race issue etc.I claimed the chinese who enjoy sex slaves have more in common with the israeli sex slave owners than with me.so race is not such an important factor,it's the behavior of the person that matters.I wouldn't participate in such activity even if it's legal and free...

after having heard of so many people enjoy a various diferent kind of perverted activities and behave savagely, or have extremely primitive cravings such as territory dominance or piling material items..i 've come to the conclusion that the people are terribly different. "we are not equal". some people have more savage genes..some can't control themselves.some behaviors are destructive to the society..

this is a key issue that has been fooling people for a long time --- the equality.it must be the biggest lie of 20th century.. dominant monkeys give people this "seemingly nice" philosophy, just to strengthen their dominance..

everyone is just a mix of genes.there are good genes and bad genes, people are quite different..we have different ability in sociology, maths,language, music etc. now the popular theory is humans are born identical, everyone has the same potentials. so you often see movies or news articles that promote stories like someone achieves some "greatness" through hard working ,hard learning..you always hear "you can do anything, just try harder!" you can be president of US, you can win olympic golden medals... as long as you are provided with good education and environment,everyone can be the best.. no matter what politician, ,left ,right..mainstream media or alternative media. even Hitler said germans were all great.

as a matter of fact. in an ideal society,without secrecy. supposedly if everybody can reach their potentials, then the leaders in all aspects of social life should be those the most advanced in each area. ,in such a society, the leaders won't worry about telling people truth about inequality, because the leaders can just easily prove they are the superior..most of the inferior humans could be easily convinced..if some can't face the reality and commit suicides,I'd say so what? that even benefits the society..but what's our society now.. the leadership positions are dominated by inferior criminals..to make their positions safer, these savages promote the so called "born equal", so,they don't need to prove themselves as the superior people..they always say you can be the president just like me. they praise,flatter people,make everyone like an arrogant jerk..so when the president fails at something or acts stupidly,they could say the president is just like everyone,just one of us.just a representive.don't be so hard on those leaders..
and if the superior people claim they are superior and should be in those positions. they could yell that we are all equal..so nobody deserves in those positions more than anybody else..

so, in a word, the equality lower the standard for themselves but restrict better people. it also gives average americans candies, so they can feel proud and be used .
in old time they use people's humbleness, today they use our arrogance..never give us a fair play.

I can't imagine if equality policy applies to football teams.. (though apparently there are nepotism and huge corruption in sports). the same for the business companies but to a lot lesser degree. the most complicated is the society. we should demand more from those so called leaders.we should be less tolerant of leaders who are suckers and not able to do the best. we should throw all "relatively better" to garbage bins.we don't need our leaders to be our nannies. we need them to lead us,to make right decision for us.. not feel sorry for us. and don't expect us to pity them either..

updated:
I think different tricks have been playing for thousand of years, but the goal is just one, to make the most advanced human beings stay out of dominant positions

well, in old time, they promoted inequality, but it was based on "blood" , which means by parenthood, through ancestry.so they often planted the most inferior ones into the positions

today ,they use people 's sentimental against and fear for "inequality" to promote equality, the result is mostly identical, or even worse.they now have more savage criminals in those positions than ever before.they now control more people than ever!

we should develope a better system, but first we should let people know we are not equal, but it's by random mix of genes, not heritage,race,custom or whatever..

people are born different,I think I'm a good example, I may not be a good leader,but I'm quite an observer.and it had been already shown when I was a little child.I hope to talk about myself in the future. by the way,i'm completely against secrecy,I want to tell everybody everything about myself, I don't want to hide anything..

today there may be some qualified people in leading positions in some social areas, but they are either bribed or threatened, they are working for the criminals..

the world is whatever we want it to be, so we really can make a better world. but first of all we must deal with "people", the world can only become better when the people become better.
the world is now full of people who don't care or who only care about their craving to save the world for their own emotion purposes,you know the men like to imagine themselves as dominant males and women either enjoy following dominant males..or sometimes being dominant females..

no more analysis now, it may really risk my account this time, I have to keep my "life" going on to fight..

faqs:
1
I have been called a pessimist, I'm a pessimist ..just because i talk about problem of people? just because I want to deal with those issues? and what 's a pessimist?
someone who faces the problem or someone who ignores the problems?.. a pessimist is not what the media try to plant on people's minds------those who do not follow them.

someone who can't see the problems is naive. those who pretend there are no problems are savage criminals..people who see the problems but feeling helpless are the "pessimists"..i'm one of few people in the world who actually believes we can help the world, but firstly like I always have been saying, we must deal with people. don't be scared of dealing with people, "people are the problems". we can't solve the problem unless we deal with the people.only with better people can we develope better system. only with better people can wecapture the monkeys who are in charge of people now..

2
i've been called arrogant, because it seems i critizise other people, not myself..

well, let's see,i'm talking about the problems of human life, not my problems.i'm not blaming others for my problems.it's not my own business..I'm trying to tell people that they are to blame for their own problems. people are to blame for the people's problems. it has nothing to do with the arrogance of me. I've even not talked about myself yet..am i a bigger or lesser problem to the society is not even a topic..I 've never had any comment on myself.

but Am I???sometimes I have strong self important delusion,this is emotion weakness, in fact I'm not special,so frequently i push myself into looking critically at myself,and analyzing me together with other people, so am i not arrogant? still can't say....
i'm quite insignificant,though i might be a more advanced human being than those monkeys in suits..but still unimportant.
i don't have too many intelligent opinions on life, society..what i wrote are merely some basic theories.. even if everyone in the world is stupid, that still can't make me qualify as very much intelligent ..,what I support is letting the real intelligent people give us their best opinions.so why not join me look critically at people and yourself at the same time, so we can all become more advanced humans

furthermore, what is arrogance?? are the people who critizise other people arrogant or the ones who praise other people?.most people especially americans probably get used to praises so much, they have extreme difficult to accept criticism.they like to blame other nations people, other race,religion,other political,philosophical views.. so they get lost in game of manipulation,exploitation .are the political candidates who praise the voters so generously, tirelessly who give them american exceptionalism the nice humans who are not arrogant??
or are they inferior savages who play simple manipulation?

3
finally i've been called a jealous person.I think that's probably from one of dominant savages I kept mentioning or his follower .which means I'm simply jealous of the rich savages.I feel that is most challenging by far.am i jealous of somebody who are much richer than me? the answer is "yes" actually..but the statement is less than 50% accurate.if someone offers me a big amount of money or a beautiful woman,i definitely wouldn't turn down the offer.but would i kill someone for the money or keep women in my cellar for sex abuse? I wouldn't, even if I can get away with it.I have savage desires too, but my desires might be less strong and more controllable.I could say the difference between me and those savages is I have a bigger desire to make a better world..being interested in creating a better society is also a desire, a much more advanced desire.I have sex drive, i also have animalistic desire to be dominant, have you heard of ralph nader ? he is probably similar to me. he is not asexual, he has every desire each of us has, but his desire to change the world surpassed his other more primitive lusts,his primitive cravings are less dominant in his veins..he is a more genetically advanced human. from what I've observed by far ,he is different from the savages such as rupert murdoch or george soros and probably 99.9% others.but since he is also quite misleading,and seriously flawed on many aspects..not one of the intelligent men i refered to, so waste no more time on him now..

our society is dominated by those total savages.some of them might be intelligent .but that's not enough, they shouldn't be on those positions, we've got to move all of them away. their animal like appetites have made the world so bad. firstly, why men such as soros have such incredible lust for money?why not me. i have never had trouble coping with money.unlike most chinese, my mind is not occupied with ideas such as how to earn a few more dollars every day..money for what? I don't need more money I live in a comfortable large house,and able to buy most titillation/entertainment stuff, or even a few famous brands.but how have I been living.I've never bought anything unnessecery for basic living for no less than 12 years.Ive being using less than 1/5 of my earnings for some years .it's not i wanted to save money.I'm simply not interested/attracted to those primitive activities,later when i deliberately avoid giving money to those savages in business.I used even less money.well, the point i'm trying to make is there is no excuse for the dishonest rich savages except that they want to dominate,manipulate,exploit, because that's how they want to live..we can't change them, we can't replace them with one another..the only solution is to get rid of them all. and I think there are plenty of people who are capable of doing their jobs better with a lot less money.

it's up to the people to deal with all those issues and it's up to a few people to deal with the majority of people first . the people define the society.imagine if most of us don't buy newspapers/magazines, don't go to cinema/concerts,don't go to schools , don't do business with the banks. don't watch tv and follow whoever looks like a attractive animal.....we can easily remove those we don't want in any position.how hard is it? we are not dogs who chase after whatever the masters throw out.

well, it's truly hard to fix the issue of leadership, but we must select "the least of all evils", not " lesser of two evils" just quoting...who is evil? evil is unbeatable ,but the savages or insanes can be dealt with if the people as a whole want to. we must develope a social,economical system through which we can choose the least savage ones who have the highest value with the balance of great intelligence and love for society.

something about the so called"liberated women" who dominate this site..

it's really hard to deal with the problem of women ,women have an incredible instinct to follow the dominant males,
if they can't be with the dominant, the would follow whatever the domiannt males tell them to do, such as feeling sorry for the least dominant males or even being with them.. so they can still more or less satisfy their huge cravings because they are doing something in associate with the dominant males...
look at the world today. not every woman is able to be with dominant males, but they they would try to impress them,
they would do anything to gain cheap attentiin from the dominant male..look at those "liberal" women they aren't "liberated", they just did those things because the dominant males wanted them to do

so, today the "liberal" women's first choice is to be with dominant males.
second choice is with the crying underdogs who the dominant males delibertately tricked the women into being with.
last choice is to be with average zombies who dream to become dominant males but very are hopeless

they would do anything to avoid males that the dominant male are afraid of....you know the dominant savage aren't afraid of those who want to replace them..because they have been dealing with them for Millennia.. they are only very scared of the less savage, more advanced human beings , such as me.
What I’m doing with my life
chinese version with slightly different thoughts

中国古人还是很有思想,除了过于追捧君主论,深度和系统化都应该至少不亚于同时期的古希腊.
虽然不甚了解百家,但是我对类似的思想却也早就有了很多思考。

好,我就用借先秦的思想,分析一下今天的世界问题,也谈谈我的思想.

当今世界的制度 和先秦的 "墨道" 是多么相似.

评价都是社会制度的角度,不谈道德人性,其实我个人的观点,人性善恶无所谓.

第一节。百家基本概况

最相似的是道家,对应现在西方的所谓"古典自由主义" (libertarian,目前代表是ron paul)
说古典是为了区分于现在所谓的liberal,不知道怎么翻译。。自称资本主义下的左派.

有人说是站在个人的角度 为天下考虑。 这种思想必然造成复古的思想。。道家要回到氏族原始社会。
自由主义要回到 18,19世纪 古典时期。 道家和自由主义极为相似都是真正意义上 “自由”。
自由是可以肯定的。道家要无为。。自由主义接近无政府。
道家的对于社会的认识是正确的,接近于唯物主义。 但是道家的药方“无为”。。是不对的,愚蠢的。
应该 在这种客观的认识下,还要"有为"。

墨家就近似于现在的 liberal,社会主义,不管怎么叫,根本原理是一样。有人说是站在天下的角度,为天下考虑。
也就是 集体主义。
这个理论的原则是 世界上每个人都要幸福,也就是要绝对平等对待。 但是怎样实现呢? 由一个人或者组织,掌握绝对的权力。
墨家和共产主义是多么相似啊。 这个思想 以集体的角度,我是支持的,但是这个集体不代表每个人. 世界不需要平等,更不可能让一个人或组织来实施平等计划。
有人说这"有点"相似共产主义..当然,他不敢多说,其实这就是彻底的共产主义,墨子已经想到了共产主义发展的必然结果..就是必须有一个绝对权力者.

儒家 ,儒家和现在西方思想没有很象的 ,但是勉强可以 联系到 保守主义。。
注意这个保守主义不是指现在的,而是传统的. 总之,儒家确实是东方独有的思想.
君是君,臣是臣。 重视规矩。。有人说这是以君主的角度为天下考虑。。
我认为倒不是.这个仍然是以天下的角度为天下考虑 只是比墨家更容易一些.妥协很多.

说儒家和西方不象,我意思是 从思想形态上西方没有突出儒家思想.但是从社会基本心态上,还是儒家的
基本思想,也就是等级制度是世界通用的..也就是说,儒家基本的思想是世界通用,但是儒家强调的思想是东方特有的.
等级制度成了几千年来一直用的制度。 很多人的意见是,这是最不坏的制度,没办法

另外儒家强调不同等级也要有不同程度的爱。这点现在西方的社会制度反而有了更多体现,
为了统治,也要仁,也要给人民利益。。很象西方的福利政策。西方以前是没有这种战略的,当代才有,吸取了儒家思想也说不定.
所以可能目前世界上最好的就是这种制度。如果必须要有等级,统治阶级
最好是一个或多或少考虑被统治阶级的..

道家和墨家都没有等级制度.虽然他们的制度下会造成 人和人更大的受益差距.但是他们并没有具体规定等级制度
所以虽然儒家 规定了具体的等级制度,但是这种制度也是能维护社会不走向极端,虽然距离美好社会还差很远.
勉强凑合用。。。

表面上看儒家要好于墨家 好于道家. 但是儒家是无法改进的..而道家和墨家只要改变个别但是关键的地方,就能变成我认为好的思想

最后就是要说 法家了。。
有人说是以君主的角度为君主考虑,这样一来,法家其实不能算是思想,而是一种方法了.
思想和儒家一样,只是方法不同,都是为了君主? 有人这个说的不清楚.
道家和墨家也都是赞成君主制的。。所以不能那样说。
道家和墨家有人归纳的很好。但是儒家和法家不能说以君主的角度为谁考虑。说不通。

法家到底什么思想? 君主制下为了君主,如果其他制度呢.如果墨家建立国家,法家会不会为了兼爱制定法律?
不得而知..
因为思想是指..道家是个人主义..墨家是集体主义.儒家是等级制度,这是思想...
而方法呢..道家是无为..墨家是让有才能的人当上级,然后绝对听从上级 .儒家是? 说老实话,我不知道儒家具体怎么维护.教育吗??

所以儒家没有具体的方法,而法家没有具体的思想..
只是方法不同. 所以在当时法家可以合并到儒家 ,称为"残酷的儒家"..

不过我认为法家的根本目的是为了维护统治。谁统治,就维护谁而已。
法家对于世界应该为了谁没有兴趣。道墨儒其实都可以使用法家的方法。

法家虽然没有思想,但是法家的方法是很成功的,法家的方法运用了到了今天.今天世界上大部分国家都是
实施依法治国的. 法家的"法比人可靠" 这句话是真理.

第二节。今天社会基本概况

今天的世界主流社会,其实还是儒墨道法可以概括的。
基础是法家的依法治国。法必须要有, 不能无为,也不能只听上级。
但是法怎么定呢,还是围绕道家的个人主义和墨家的集体主义。
主张个人主义的,要减少法,主张集体主义的要增加法。

表面上以法家作为基本方法,暗地上也巧妙运用儒家的一些技巧来统治今天的社会,
具体很难言传.前面说了,为了维护统治要"爱民",要"行善"等

法家的方法是真理,古代为君主服务,今天原则上为所有人服务.不能不为,因为今天的社会和人已经进化到不能接受君主制了.
法被迫为人民服务,但是问题的关键在于 法真的可靠吗? 法比人可靠,这个没错.但是法本身可靠吗?
商鞅死了..但是现在法制, 今天的商鞅估计死不了.. 这说明法已经被滥用了,已经被研究透了,有的人已经不怕法了.
所以今天的法,为人服务的同时,也被滥用。

儒家的思想已经不能见光了。这里说一下,我说的全部是政治制度。。儒家的道德还有一点意义
但是社会制度 不可能,今天不可能还相信人生来就高贵。。
这里要说一下一个重要概念就是“人是否平等?”
对待,但是他没有说墨家和道家对于 “人生下来是否平等”作出说明。
所以我帮他说吧。虽然我没有读过任何哲学书籍。 道家的观念肯定是不平等的,因为道家是客观认识世界,
自然界是客观的,是随机的。如果客观存在,自然不可能一样,自然不可能平等。。现代的自由主义,个人主义也从来都不谈论。
人是否平等的话题。因为是敏感话题,或者说是致命的话题。至于墨家,我认为墨家不关心人是否生来平等,只认为 应该平等对待。
即使不平等,也要平等对待。。 共产主义我不熟悉,但是唯物主义者应该不会认为平等吧。只有信上帝才会认为平等。

法家只是方法,儒家排除了,剩下 也就是道家和墨家了,个人主义和集体主义的对立应该才是世界上政治学的难题.

本来应该是在围绕个人主义和集体主义的争斗,取长补短.个人主义和集体主义本来是可以对立统一的嘛.
但是今天,个人主义和集体主义的思想主要是用来洗脑的..
结果现在是2个极端的争斗,要么剥削,要么分田地

个人主义/自由主义就是自由资本主义,也就是资本主义
集体主义就是所谓的社会主义. 目前西方国家总体上是介于 "自由资本主义"和"带有社会主义元素的高福利的国家资本主义".

今天的美国制度非常非常混乱! 2党的哲学思想完全不连贯.

2党都同时具有个人主义和集体主义.没问题.但是在
个人自由和经济自由的问题,非常混淆..只有ron paul代表个人主义的极端.ralph nader 是最集体主义的,但是距离极端还差的远.
美国是稍微偏向"自由资本主义"的. 而欧洲偏向"高福利的国家资本主义"
ralph nader ,ron paul这2人极端,票都少的可怜,被排除在外,顺理成章。难道剩余的2党比较合理的结合了集体主义和个人主义?其实2党穿一条裤子.在演戏。目的就是要搞乱这2种对立思想。
看起来是集体主义和个人主义在斗.但实际上2党是在混淆,模糊概念.

第三节。我的思想

墨家“站在天下的角度为天下考虑”这本来是对的,绝对的真理。但关键要纠正一点。。天下不是平分给所有人。
“站在天下的角度为天下考虑”失败的原因 ,就是把天下平分给了每个人。。不能这样分。

道家“站在个人的角度 为天下考虑”。对个人的认识,这本来也是对的,但是个人独立的条件下是一定无法保证秩序的,必定造成不公平。
天下客观的说是个人组成.但是为了天下考虑,要把它看成一个整体.世界必须有规矩。。无为不行。。要有为,很有为。或者说是类似于集体主义。

我一直在想的是以道家的基础认识,用法家的方法,从而达到介于 墨家和儒家之间的目的。
所谓墨家和儒家之间的目的 就是 不平等,也不过于划分等级。

出发点最坏的是儒/法家. 但是因为道家要无为.墨家要平等..所以结论或者说结局儒家要好于2者.
但是我也说了 只要改变关键的一点 道家和墨家都优于儒家.

天下,不是君主的, 也不是臣民的
你不能把大部分给君主,也不能把天下平分给君主和臣民。 只有君主好了,或者只有臣民好了。。这个世界都不算好。
要都好才算好。

为什么世界到目前为止没有一个人说出这样的道理呢?

为什么不能形成一种制度,既没有剥削,也不平等呢? 一个人该得到多少就得到多少嘛。

我想我们应该要建立一个理论 就是“一切都是为了社会”。以这个原则来处理事情。

所以,我的基本思想是要集体主义,但又不能平等。共产主义失败就是因为平均主义。不过话说回来,
如果不平均,谁革命? 社会必须极端,必须有人得到好处才能支持。

我的这些建议 穷人,富人 都不赞成。但是 社会如果有生命的话,社会会支持我。

现在的主流社会和我刚好相反,是个人主义下,提倡平等,或者说怜悯.. 这种平等比我集体主义下的不平等还要远远更不平等.是要客观的不平等,还是虚伪的平等?

注意这里我还没有讨论 人生来平等与否,我说的平等是平均对待。。平等分配.

第四节。。欺骗和控制。

原始社会(不是原始生产力)难道不好吗?
原始社会就是遵循该怎么做就怎么做。。不这么做就无法生存。。。
没有剥削但也不平等。。 原始社会为了保证劳动力,不是让老人饿死吗,现在的社会当然不用让老人饿死。
但是从这个例子能看出来 原始社会必须实施公平的法则。虽然很残酷。。老人饿死很残酷,但是没办法!
不能劳动,但是食物有限,就只能死。原始社会也不能欺骗。。所以原始社会其实是最公平的社会。

原始社会公平是被迫的,必须有能力的人当领导,必须有捕猎能力的人优先吃饭,不这样的部落不能生存,被淘汰了。

但是后来的社会不同。生产力发展。不公平也可以生存了,甚至还能发展。在不公平的情况下,人类发展了几千年。
后来的社会是这样的,首先是不公平也可以生存了。另外一个很关键的一点是可以欺骗了。。在原始社会是无法欺骗的,
人们生活在一起,每个人都熟悉每个自己部落的人,没有隐私,所以无法欺骗。
后来有条件隐私之后,就有条件欺骗了。 有了欺骗才有了权力的扩大。
我想最早的有至高权力的头目一定是有能力的人,但同时通过欺骗,夸大自己能力的人。
到了后来能力 越来越小,欺骗越来越大。

随着发展人识别欺骗的能力在加强。。
但是欺骗的方式也在发展。。到了现在或者近代,权力已经无法控制人了。所以才抛出了各种思想。。
既然野蛮失去效果,绝对权力无法控制人了,就渐渐改为思想控制。

也就是说生产力的发展使得欺骗控制成为可能,但是生产力的发展也终究要让被欺骗的人清醒。
欺骗者必须不断的改变方法。。目前西方基本进入了软控制的时代。

世界的竞争从摧毁变成了控制,世界的统治从压迫变成了控制。我的一个预测是世界大战不会再有了。

第五节。。人们是怎样被控制的?

我总结出 3点

1,鼓励人口增长,鼓励移民。但有可能表面上反对人口增加。
中国不鼓励人口增加是因为中国人实在过多。不过中国有应试教育这个基本国策愚民。所以不怕。
人越多素质越差,越容易控制 人越多也越难聚在一起。懂吧。

2,降低社会标准,宣传平等思想。
这里我专门讨论人是否生来平等。这个话题中国学术界基本不讨论,总体上人们默认人生来不平等,头脑,身体,性格都有好坏。
只是因为别人的面子和自身修养,一般人们不说出来,比较忌讳。当然了中国传统观念虽然认可人不平等,但还是比较遵守人命相对平等。

人生来平等的思想主要是西方在倡导,但至少20世纪中期以后的事情了。在19世纪中后期相反是极为提倡不平等的。
19世纪后期西方已经没有封建层面上的不平等了。所谓不平等就是科学上的研究结论,基因是有遗传性,也有随机性。
西方现在主流的思想已经是人生来是一样的或者说几乎一样,成败是在后天。
纯环境理论可以用兄弟截然不同来轻松反驳。

那么为了要宣传人平等呢? 一个字 “纵”。这个“纵”字 2层意思。放纵自己,统治者,也放纵百姓。
既然不能愚民,那么就相反,让他们骄傲。让他们心里满足,告诉他们你可以!
这样针对不同的人群,是一箭三雕 1是让普通人心里满足,安抚他们,或者说是贿赂他们

2是让很多人傲慢,每个人都可以当总统,每个人机会相同,就是口号。要知道愚民和骄民异曲同工..

3是埋没了真正有才干的人,这些人不能出头。威胁他们统治。

这3点从根本上,降低了对人的要求,降低了对领导者的要求。选举变成了选美。

现在领导者的素质已经是历史上最低点。领导者应该最好的那个人,这点我赞同墨子。
如果人平等,那么领导人就可以是芸芸众生的一个, 不要求领导有能力,只要求他能挨骂
把领袖说成公仆也是错误的。领袖就是最有领导才能的那个人。最懂社会发展的人。
不是怜悯,也不是乱骂的对象。

世界的根本在于人, 不应该的人出现在不应该的位置是造成社会问题的根本。
现在世界上流行的说法就是要宽容的对人,有人也强调了。但这个说法是错误。
世界最理想的状态是 每个人都享受其他人,而不是容忍其他人。

对待人不要宽容,反而要提高标准,对待领导者更应该提高标准。

今天的社会充满了暴力,腐败,仇恨,嫉妒,迷乱,忍受,孤独和抱怨。

我们只有除去不适合人渣,这个社会才可能变好。。

3,鼓吹各种极端思想,

其实很多极端思想都有可能是故意制造出来的,宗教思想,政治思想。,甚至法西斯,共产主义都可能是故意安排出来。
从此就有了借口反对类似的思想。树立一个,再把他打倒,这是常用手段。

关于人的平等,我还要说一下。判断一个人是根据其对社会的价值,每个人的价值不同。比如音乐,数学,思想,语言 这些都是天赋。

第五节。创造一个更好的社会。

这段我有专门的论述,慢慢的分析.这里先简单的说,因为和前面的不太连贯,有太多具体的问题.

要象对待原始社会中破坏部落生存的人那样对待今天破坏社会前进的人。
原始社会饿死不能劳动的老人,现在的社会也要剥夺阻挠社会前进的人的一些权利,比如 不能投票,不能生育后代,甚至被流放出社会等。

谁不能投票参政? 没有思想和智力的人
谁不能生育? 吃福利的人。无害也无用的人
谁被驱逐出社会? 对社会有害的人。

这些措施很残酷吗? 多余的人
世界上没有让所有人都满意的制度.所以最好就是集体主义下的不平等, 最公平,对社会最好.

制定一套这样的规则,大部分人其实是同意的。关键是怎么监督,我曾经大力提倡就是用现在高科技手段监督。

为此我也写过具体的措施,就是我们适量放弃隐私。如果全部放弃最好。
但是只要放弃出门在外的隐私 这里世界就可以根本改变。。在社会生活,包括人类情感上都有进步,能变的更融洽。
你去了哪里,网络联系了谁。这些够了。不一定要知道通讯内容和具体做事。

创造一个没有秘密的世界,秘密是罪恶,危险和痛苦的根源。

这样的想法在以前是空想,但是在今天因为科技的发展有了可能,这样的社会,每个人都可以得到该得到的。
每个人都可以正确判断其他所有人,因为每个人的生活都活生生的全面展现在每个人面前。。
形成一个网络,不需要特殊的人来控制。

以后还可以用高科技手段的芯片技术。应该要求领导者先植入芯片。世界再也不用在秘密中运作了。

这样的世界是人类彻底的解放。目前的互联网已经算是小小的进步了。人的信息得到充实。
洗脑变的更难了。但是还远远不够。

科技比法律更可靠.

第六节 一些补充

今天的社会应该通过高科技手段建立类似原始社会的机制。。一个不需要法的社会,至少是不以法为核心.

这个观点和道家自由主义追捧的回到过去 是完全不一样的.
道家回到原始社会,自由主义回到古典时期 都是为了没有法或者减少法的约束.今天的社会没有法可以吗??

都说原始社会,但 向往 "不需要法" 和"没有法" 是不同的,完全相反的,甚至可以说是完全对立的.
活在一个需要法 却没有法的社会比活在一个集权的社会还要恐怖的.

所以说儒家是中庸,道家,墨家都是极端,比儒家差.但是把道墨合理的结合在一起,就能形成理想社会.

其实法家有很多好方法,"连坐"本来是很好的方法,但是不应该那么极端。
发现很多思想和方法被人为的极端化了。比如平等。就像是有预谋的。
连坐其实是那时候条件下很好的监督方法,但是连坐应该要减轻刑法。。这样不就让人能接受了吗?
为什么非要搞剥削,或者平等,让某一些人受不了呢?

其实“有能力的”得到很多,对社会倒没有太多害处。因为有能力的毕竟是少数。。但是,现在
的机制是,因为有能力得到很多,所以很多人通过欺骗手段 伪装成有能力的。
贡献和收入不成正比好说,关键是很多对社会有害的人得到很多。。
不能让低等的伪装成高等的。也不能让高等的伪装成更高等的。当然也不能让高等的把低等的变成更低等的。
I’m really good at
Anthropology
Favorite books, movies, shows, music, and food
the stuff are quite manipulative.. but I admit my childhood favourite movies are those continental left wing political films ..Aka. marxist filmmaking.. those italian directors. or french citizen of italian heritage such as giovanni, damiani, enrico.....

Ironically, I also liked american old fashioned epic romance, you know the biggest hit.

I enjoyed both european and japanese sentimental films..

music and some video games are ok too....
On a typical Friday night I am
A reply to a competent "liberal" in which I mentioned my attitude toward "secrets".

quote
okkkkkkkkkkkk Anne! i know you are a liberal, a commie, an "I can save the world" type.

well ,you commented that I was arrogant to think I could save the world.. but the difference between me and typical liberals is that I
don't think me or anyone can change the world.. I think it's the people that might change themselves. yeah, frankly I do think
the biggest problem of the world is that the majority of people are stupid and arrogant, this resembles quite the animals, animals don't know or care about anything except themselves..
apparently,the hardest thing for them to do is to sit down and discuss their problems..they are the center of their world..
so, the only way to improve the world is not letting the people who behave in such stupid manner get into position of influence anymore.
the difference between me and many people,perhaps including you is i don't care much about being special, if the world could become better, I~wouldn't mind being the only one who is banned from voting or carrying a gun..i'm not a gun supporter, I'm a war opponent,I'm not a religion fanatic, i'm for abortion.but i've been often called a "right wing".what is a right wing??if the world has become better, in an advanced society where the people think i'm not qualified to inhabit, i can leave...i wouldn't mind being a poor man's any more advanced human being.
I'm also a lot less secretive, there are no secrets I'm not willing to tell, that makes me even less special.. Anne, did you find a lots of "secrets" in my pages?

Anne. you want to see the majesty, the beauty in everyone....wow, sounds like an elitist liberal..
so, don't you have the desire to find joy or beauty in me?
maybe associating with me can't make you feel special?
you have neither the craving to feel superior to me, or be submissive to me..
so, you won't either exhibit your big loving heart to me or follow me like a stupid little girl...

quote
The most private thing I’m willing to admit
the world has the hope! as i mentioned at the start of my page..we must totally remove privacy.remove it from people's mind..this is a great solution to all problems the world ever had..
it helps select leaders, prevent crime, improve society ,also improve human relationship..

in a world without secrecy, there will be no cheat, everyone gets what he deserves. we can perfectly judge everyone by looking at his life.. we should establish a record system which shows every aspect of a citizen's life. I mean everyone can see everyone, it's a network..not supervised by some departments

in old time, it might be a fantasy.. but today, the technology has improved so greatly,we can use chips in those people who are in important positions.. we are stupid to let secretive savages in those position.

a world without secrets is a world of total liberation. I can see a great chance for human race. the internet is already an improvement. those who manipulate us are more difficult to hide than before ...but still far from enough. they are working hard on brainwashing us to make up for the loss they have to undergo due to the update of technology.

so, we don't even need any political system, just let anybody realize everything..

faqs, I've been told by some leader wannabes that without privacy , people will lose characters and become like machines..
my reply: on the contrary it's the world today full of cheats, coldness,and violence that make people live like robots..
the life couldn't be worse... .

in prehistoric time, there are no privavcy. because there were no tools to help people behave in a secretive manner.,then in early history, people can hide in society, because there were no way to expose them.. but today, an advanced society.
it's such a great opportunity.... to update people's mind.
I’m looking for
  • Everybody
  • Ages 19–99
  • Located anywhere
  • For new friends, long-term dating, short-term dating, activity partners, long-distance penpals
You should message me if
my page is a fossil proof of someone who is obsessed with principles

finally I've got an initial contact from a woman, she pretends to be everything i like, she says" I'm attracted by intelligence and sincerity, courage, mental strength, someone who sticks to his principles ...."and for someone experienced as me there is certainly something very fishy , but as i said my weakness is struggling to find a soulmate, an intelligent woman. so i fall for her tricks.
later, it's the same story, she is merely stimulated by me, you know my aggressive attitude toward some disgusting people such as Rockefeller or Gore. she has a fantasy that i 'm a more dominant male...........it's mental masturbation.. when she wakes up and is aware that i'm an economical nobody... you can't imagine the great Dr Jekyll and Miss Hyde performance!!!

bigger tragedy! my words haven't woken up people, instead because of my confident tone , ignited more craze of them..

here what i'm trying to say is women are not attracted to intelligent opinions,so, whether mine are intelligent or not.
they are not to impress women.. i write all of those because it's great opportunity .people should use internet to know more information . the college professors should be much more honest ,competent and responsible if they expect us back to listen to them.

I can't find a soulmate at local ,so I use the net.. I hope it benefits my life