His journal posts
by Carl Sagan
"A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage"
Suppose (I'm following a group therapy approach by the psychologist
Richard Franklin) I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely
you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been
innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real
evidence. What an opportunity!
"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and
see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but no
dragon.
"Where's the dragon?" you ask.
"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to
mention that she's an invisible dragon."
You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture
the dragon's footprints.
"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."
Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible
fire.
"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."
You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.
"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't
stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a
special explanation of why it won't work.
Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal,
floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If
there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment
that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my
dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at
all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be
tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless,
whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our
sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing,
in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. The only thing you've
really learned from my insistence that there's a dragon in my
garage is that something funny is going on inside my head. You'd
wonder, if no physical tests apply, what convinced me. The
possibility that it was a dream or a hallucination would certainly
enter your mind. But then, why am I taking it so seriously? Maybe I
need help. At the least, maybe I've seriously underestimated human
fallibility. Imagine that, despite none of the tests being
successful, you wish to be scrupulously open-minded. So you don't
outright reject the notion that there's a fire-breathing dragon in
my garage. You merely put it on hold. Present evidence is strongly
against it, but if a new body of data emerge you're prepared to
examine it and see if it convinces you. Surely it's unfair of me to
be offended at not being believed; or to criticize you for being
stodgy and unimaginative -- merely because you rendered the
Scottish verdict of "not proved."
Imagine that things had gone otherwise. The dragon is invisible,
all right, but footprints are being made in the flour as you watch.
Your infrared detector reads off-scale. The spray paint reveals a
jagged crest bobbing in the air before you. No matter how skeptical
you might have been about the existence of dragons -- to say
nothing about invisible ones -- you must now acknowledge that
there's something here, and that in a preliminary way it's
consistent with an invisible, fire-breathing dragon.
Now another scenario: Suppose it's not just me. Suppose that
several people of your acquaintance, including people who you're
pretty sure don't know each other, all tell you that they have
dragons in their garages -- but in every case the evidence is
maddeningly elusive. All of us admit we're disturbed at being
gripped by so odd a conviction so ill-supported by the physical
evidence. None of us is a lunatic. We speculate about what it would
mean if invisible dragons were really hiding out in garages all
over the world, with us humans just catching on. I'd rather it not
be true, I tell you. But maybe all those ancient European and
Chinese myths about dragons weren't myths at all.
Gratifyingly, some dragon-size footprints in the flour are now
reported. But they're never made when a skeptic is looking. An
alternative explanation presents itself. On close examination it
seems clear that the footprints could have been faked. Another
dragon enthusiast shows up with a burnt finger and attributes it to
a rare physical manifestation of the dragon's fiery breath. But
again, other possibilities exist. We understand that there are
other ways to burn fingers besides the breath of invisible dragons.
Such "evidence" -- no matter how important the dragon advocates
consider it -- is far from compelling. Once again, the only
sensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis,
to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the cause
might be that so many apparently sane and sober people share the
same strange delusion.
by Carl Sagan
"A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage"
Suppose (I'm following a group therapy approach by the psychologistRichard Franklin) I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surelyyou'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have beeninnumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no realevidence. What an opportunity!
"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside andsee a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but nodragon.
"Where's the dragon?" you ask.
"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected tomention that she's an invisible dragon."
You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capturethe dragon's footprints.
"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."
Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisiblefire.
"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."
You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.
"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won'tstick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with aspecial explanation of why it won't work.
Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal,floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? Ifthere's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experimentthat would count against it, what does it mean to say that mydragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not atall the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot betested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless,whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting oursense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing,in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. The only thing you'vereally learned from my insistence that there's a dragon in mygarage is that something funny is going on inside my head. You'dwonder, if no physical tests apply, what convinced me. Thepossibility that it was a dream or a hallucination would certainlyenter your mind. But then, why am I taking it so seriously? Maybe Ineed help. At the least, maybe I've seriously underestimated humanfallibility. Imagine that, despite none of the tests beingsuccessful, you wish to be scrupulously open-minded. So you don'toutright reject the notion that there's a fire-breathing dragon inmy garage. You merely put it on hold. Present evidence is stronglyagainst it, but if a new body of data emerge you're prepared toexamine it and see if it convinces you. Surely it's unfair of me tobe offended at not being believed; or to criticize you for beingstodgy and unimaginative -- merely because you rendered theScottish verdict of "not proved."
Imagine that things had gone otherwise. The dragon is invisible,all right, but footprints are being made in the flour as you watch.Your infrared detector reads off-scale. The spray paint reveals ajagged crest bobbing in the air before you. No matter how skepticalyou might have been about the existence of dragons -- to saynothing about invisible ones -- you must now acknowledge thatthere's something here, and that in a preliminary way it'sconsistent with an invisible, fire-breathing dragon.
Now another scenario: Suppose it's not just me. Suppose thatseveral people of your acquaintance, including people who you'repretty sure don't know each other, all tell you that they havedragons in their garages -- but in every case the evidence ismaddeningly elusive. All of us admit we're disturbed at beinggripped by so odd a conviction so ill-supported by the physicalevidence. None of us is a lunatic. We speculate about what it wouldmean if invisible dragons were really hiding out in garages allover the world, with us humans just catching on. I'd rather it notbe true, I tell you. But maybe all those ancient European andChinese myths about dragons weren't myths at all.
Gratifyingly, some dragon-size footprints in the flour are nowreported. But they're never made when a skeptic is looking. Analternative explanation presents itself. On close examination itseems clear that the footprints could have been faked. Anotherdragon enthusiast shows up with a burnt finger and attributes it toa rare physical manifestation of the dragon's fiery breath. Butagain, other possibilities exist. We understand that there areother ways to burn fingers besides the breath of invisible dragons.Such "evidence" -- no matter how important the dragon advocatesconsider it -- is far from compelling. Once again, the onlysensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis,to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the causemight be that so many apparently sane and sober people share thesame strange delusion.
The Dragon In My Garage
[quote]LOL, when you think jesus is all about teaching love, I know
for a fact you have to clue what he is all about. I see your an
atheist...Not that I am going to try to convert you, that would be
a waste, the first gift we all have been given is the gift of
choice. And eve, then adam choose to bite the fruit and open their
eyes, so to speak. Besides, if you were a real atheist, you would
know more about Christianity then most christians. To me, that is
the mark of a true Atheist anyways. They are always good to go to
when I need to find something out about the bible.[/quote]
Wow, what a douchebag. this is some of the most ridiculously stupid
shit i've read on the internet tonight. a real atheist knows more
about christianity then christians? what does that say about your
religion then? i love this type of christian. not only does he take
me completely out of context, he is so righteous he feels the need
to post in someone's personal journal to insult someones thoughts
and opinions. it merely strengthens my resolve.
edit, i meant to say personal journal, not private, you people can
fucking relax now.
[quote]LOL, when you think jesus is all about teaching love, I knowfor a fact you have to clue what he is all about. I see your anatheist...Not that I am going to try to convert you, that would bea waste, the first gift we all have been given is the gift ofchoice. And eve, then adam choose to bite the fruit and open theireyes, so to speak. Besides, if you were a real atheist, you wouldknow more about Christianity then most christians. To me, that isthe mark of a true Atheist anyways. They are always good to go towhen I need to find something out about the bible.[/quote]
Wow, what a douchebag. this is some of the most ridiculously stupidshit i've read on the internet tonight. a real atheist knows moreabout christianity then christians? what does that say about yourreligion then? i love this type of christian. not only does he takeme completely out of context, he is so righteous he feels the needto post in someone's personal journal to insult someones thoughtsand opinions. it merely strengthens my resolve.
edit, i meant to say personal journal, not private, you people canfucking relax now.
A recent comment in my journal.
I've noticed when i see someone under 50 percent match i can come
to the immediate conclusion that jesus will be mentioned multiple
times in her profile. i could almost make a drinking game out of
it. recently, i read a profile that mentioned jesus in three of her
sections and also a fondness of UFC. ah, christianity, when you
aren't teaching love, you enjoy watching two men beat the shit out
of eachother. We've come so far.
I've noticed when i see someone under 50 percent match i can cometo the immediate conclusion that jesus will be mentioned multipletimes in her profile. i could almost make a drinking game out ofit. recently, i read a profile that mentioned jesus in three of hersections and also a fondness of UFC. ah, christianity, when youaren't teaching love, you enjoy watching two men beat the shit outof eachother. We've come so far.
Under 50 percent...
Zomg! Cliff Bars and Apple Juice!
Zomg! Cliff Bars and Apple Juice!
Cliff Bars and Apple Juice
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
um
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
i think i'm a crazy magnet
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
or something
kate folsom says (3:50 AM):
Oh, I bet you are.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
i just got done talking to a woman who msgd me on okc
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
care to guess where this one is from?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
ghana...
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
kate, hold me, i'm scared for humanity
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
she was all like, would you like to have a long distance
relationship
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
....
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
7000 miles away? suriously?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
where do they come from?
kate folsom says (3:53 AM):
That would be hard to manage, yes.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
got to be a scammer
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
i play stupid rich american
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
and somewhere along the line, i'm supposed to send her money
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
i'm sooo betting
kate folsom says (3:53 AM):
well, don't you love her?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
totally
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
I'M SO LONELY
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
*gets out checkbook*
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
Hey, you know, I'm not even deceitful.
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
I'll just take your money.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
That is why I'm a much better person to talk to.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
i gave you 25 bucks already
kate folsom says (3:55 AM):
I know!
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
and i didn't even get a handjob
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
kate folsom says (3:55 AM):
Dude, $25 is at least two handjobs at the "friend" rate.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
suriously?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
*goes to write some strongly worded letters*
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
Well, yeah.
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
I mean, come on.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:56 AM):
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
We're pals!
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:56 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
i'm so sick
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
i should be sleeping
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
ugh
kate folsom says (3:58 AM):
I woke up after less than four hours.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
yuck
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
i need like ten
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
or 12
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
or a week
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
...
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:59 AM):
know how to induce a coma?
kate folsom says (3:59 AM):
Sadly, no.
kate folsom says (3:59 AM):
Not reliably.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
work tomorrow is going to suck
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
it's going to suck my balls
kate folsom says (4:00 AM):
Well, that's nice of it.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
not in a good way
kate folsom says (4:00 AM):
Oh, crap.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
like in a 16 year old girl who has never sucked a pair of balls
before
kate folsom says (4:01 AM):
Yikes.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:01 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:01 AM):
totally
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
um
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
i think i'm a crazy magnet
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
or something
kate folsom says (3:50 AM):
Oh, I bet you are.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:50 AM):
i just got done talking to a woman who msgd me on okc
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
care to guess where this one is from?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
ghana...
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:51 AM):
kate, hold me, i'm scared for humanity
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
she was all like, would you like to have a long distancerelationship
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
....
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:52 AM):
7000 miles away? suriously?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
where do they come from?
kate folsom says (3:53 AM):
That would be hard to manage, yes.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
got to be a scammer
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
i play stupid rich american
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
and somewhere along the line, i'm supposed to send her money
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:53 AM):
i'm sooo betting
kate folsom says (3:53 AM):
well, don't you love her?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
totally
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
I'M SO LONELY
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
*gets out checkbook*
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
Hey, you know, I'm not even deceitful.
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
I'll just take your money.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
kate folsom says (3:54 AM):
That is why I'm a much better person to talk to.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:54 AM):
i gave you 25 bucks already
kate folsom says (3:55 AM):
I know!
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
and i didn't even get a handjob
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
kate folsom says (3:55 AM):
Dude, $25 is at least two handjobs at the "friend" rate.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
suriously?
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:55 AM):
*goes to write some strongly worded letters*
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
Well, yeah.
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
I mean, come on.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:56 AM):
kate folsom says (3:56 AM):
We're pals!
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:56 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
i'm so sick
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
i should be sleeping
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:57 AM):
ugh
kate folsom says (3:58 AM):
I woke up after less than four hours.
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
yuck
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
i need like ten
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
or 12
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
or a week
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:58 AM):
...
Licorice & Shreddies says (3:59 AM):
know how to induce a coma?
kate folsom says (3:59 AM):
Sadly, no.
kate folsom says (3:59 AM):
Not reliably.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
work tomorrow is going to suck
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
it's going to suck my balls
kate folsom says (4:00 AM):
Well, that's nice of it.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
not in a good way
kate folsom says (4:00 AM):
Oh, crap.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:00 AM):
like in a 16 year old girl who has never sucked a pair of ballsbefore
kate folsom says (4:01 AM):
Yikes.
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:01 AM):
yeah
Licorice & Shreddies says (4:01 AM):
totally
insomnia chronicles
People say I have a very pretty face and also a killer body... but
my sweet cherry pie is really what is good! I get along best with
people who are always looking for new people, places and
experiences. I've always.."greetings "!! !! im looking to your
profile and i like what i saw...if you are interested in hook up ,
let me know and send me a flower . . make sure that you will bring
a box of condom ok?LOL...add me at lorienne_694u at yah00 d0t c0mm
or at hun_cherica at h0tmail d0t c0mmm..
a whole box of condoms, eh?
sure we can't just have coffee first?
People say I have a very pretty face and also a killer body... butmy sweet cherry pie is really what is good! I get along best withpeople who are always looking for new people, places andexperiences. I've always.."greetings "!! !! im looking to yourprofile and i like what i saw...if you are interested in hook up ,let me know and send me a flower . . make sure that you will bringa box of condom ok?LOL...add me at lorienne_694u at yah00 d0t c0mmor at hun_cherica at h0tmail d0t c0mmm..
a whole box of condoms, eh?
sure we can't just have coffee first?
My okc mailbox today.
Licorice & Shreddies says (6:49 PM):
is odwalla and gummi bears an acceptable dinner?
kate folsom says (6:49 PM):
YES!
Licorice & Shreddies says (6:49 PM):
fantastic
Licorice & Shreddies says (6:49 PM):
is odwalla and gummi bears an acceptable dinner?
kate folsom says (6:49 PM):
YES!
Licorice & Shreddies says (6:49 PM):
fantastic
OM NOM NOM