Ok why am I so offended because the reason for me been marked as a totalitarian is because I am rigid in my ethical principles and believe in deontological ethical values. It is extraordinary, ironic, if not comically flawed to be labelled such for these reasons.
Ok lets see Nazism started of in 1891 by a unique cult that worshiped Satan. (Note this is a very good start for rigid deontological values (if you cannot tell when am been sarcastic just ask me for details))
Further more Nazism was greatly influenced by, and Hitler himself often referred to the ideal of emotivism Friedrich Nietzsche Hershel and Heidegger been among the names mentioned. in brief for those that do not know the theory of emotivism states that morality does not exist is flawed it is apparently human made ideals and is nothing more then boo hurrah. So in effect there is literally nothing wrong in murder rape extortion or even genocide. This is the influence upon Hitler. Yeah well this is sounding very similar to objective morality?
Although in fairness Nietzsche does not appear to justify or say anything to deserve to be associated with Adolf Hitler. Though there are similarities in places, I am often fascinated how NIETZCHE comes so close to pure genius and then stops short he is literally steps away from proving objective morality to stand against ever Cartesian scepticism. Unfortunately he fails to recognise the link needed and thus like so many others stops short. Instead he appears to argue for the impossibility of truth.
with regard to Hitler so far I appear completely opposite to the guy yet these character traits been the very principles which so directly associate me with him. According to these tests anyway.
There is however one point I very closely associate with Hitler on. This been his idea on unity. unity is the key to ultimate power is the essential nature of life the universe god existence and everything. however making or expecting people to kill countless amounts of people enslave conquer or commit crimes against humanity is hardly the ideal way to expect these people to be unified in any form of unit group or organisation. Hence why, despite all the rhetoric the Nazi's became very corrupt and dis-unified.
some notes to clarify here Unity does not mean people forced to be the same way in ideology in opinions tastes or other such means. The very principle of unity been so strong is because it allows multiple ideas multiple characters or variations to be utilized. Maximum development is reliant on the ideal of benefiting from the maximum ideas or things from the maximum supply. Incorrect ideas or things not suitable for the current organisation team or environment can be rejected, but to deny them consideration or any acknowledgement is to deny oneself awareness of them. to be denied awareness of an idea often means you cannot recognise good ideas or bad ideas in many cases as such this often leads to ineffective inefficient and stagnated progress or growth. in effect then the idea system would be a democratic country of free speech!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sounds real totalitarian dosnt it?
Back to Nietzsche so, so close to genius so frustrating in many places in his writings Nietzsche refers to the idea that whilst morality may or may not exist it is perhaps suggestible that human survival is reliant on it. What genius what pure genius unfortunately Nietzsche missed the glorious diamond mind walking right past this off the cliff into the daggers of current philosophy which pollutes and poisons the ideals the strength and the intelligence of modern society.
Morality is essential to human survival, is not merely a reason to suggest that humans commit to there own made morality, it is irrefutable undeniable proof that morality exists objectively and independently of human conception. (note I am ware of the repetitive statement been a grammatical error this had to be done because regrettably not everyone fully understands philosophical language.)
Finally then morality or believe in a deontological system is not totalitarianism or Nazis. The way to which one handles or goes about there ideas view points or beliefs can be dangerous totalitarian or even Nazi like however this does not mean there is anything wrong with having any ideas beliefs or view points it merely means one should be careful as to how one advocates or acts on there ideals.
To further clarify I belief abortion denial of life is always wrong I believe I believe extortion or exploitation is always wrong. i have many more beliefs to which I will not waste further time going into here. what is the case though is that by e having these view points or by me advocating such view points does not make me totalitarian nazi like or such. It is my duty to express and advocate my view point in society and the duty of others whom refute or agree with my view point to do likewise so that society can develop and benefit from the most effective idea.
It would e totalitarian like to force these ways on others a state arguably does this but is not totalitarian because it does so by the consent of the majority hence by considering and respecting peoples view points and via debate concluding the appropriate cause of action for society. It is not totalitarian for me to express advocate or have my view points. Unjustly forcing these on others would be. Arguing advocating and democratically supporting such ideals is not. Having morality or deontological principles is not.
Publicly shaming falsely labelling and intentionally causing or encouraging social rejections of those to which have different view points to oneself is in effect totalitarian or Nazi like. Therefore I argue it to be my contention that those who labelled me as a Nazi or totalitarian due to having deontological ethical values are in fact by doing so behaving as totalitarians or Nazi's. this is further emphasised by the public display of my rating and the option not been available for myself to hide it. I am in effect been punished and publicly shamed for having my principles. Surely such is totalitarian.
I am gifted, motivated, and determined