But, and anyway: If you want to imagine who I am, this profile is not a bad jumping-off point.
This is version 1.8 of me, and is the most stable release. Changes since version 1.7 are mostly that I took a few jokes out. They were funny but I was tired of them. Version 1.9 will have new jokes.
Only experienced users are invited to write and apply to join the beta program. Version 2, the new release candidate, is still "buggy," in technical parlance.
(For example, the OKCupid Robot, in selecting for me a match for the Dec. 21 Mayan Calendar End of the World, went with someone who loves the Bible and Harry Porter (sic). Since the Robot is mostly infallible, I have to think the problem is on my end.)
I have answered a LOT of questions on this site publicly ... because it's fun to do. And I'd like to add these caveats to just about all my answers.
1. Just because I say I might doesn't mean I would.
2. I reserve the right to change my mind.
3. It depends.
And I will assume the same on your behalf. Reading the answers to questions -- and the explanations -- is much more interesting than reading the profiles.
Usually.
...
At various times in my life, people have told me I look like or have even actually mistaken me for:
Peter Frampton
Gene Wilder
"That guy in the Moody Blues"
Richard Branson
I choose to believe I was being flattered.
Add Bruce Davison to the list (May 14.)
I should probably retake the "slut" test. Not that I lied, but there must be some sort of ... ummmm ... slightly more conservative version of the facts that will get my score down. As is, it perhaps describes me as I've been occasionally but not recently.
I'm aware that my frivolity can be deadly irksome to those who are here on serious relationship quests and missions.
I would like to form a support group for other people who had to memorize all the helping verbs and, years later, can still recite them effortlessly, fast enough that you can hear a sonic boom as they whoosh out. I'd hate to think that I am the only one.