Message Him

Join OkCupid

Find better matches with our advanced matching system

—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy

seeldevil

43 / M / Bisexual / Single

Kalamazoo, Michigan

His journal posts

Another job

May 13, 2009

Off to pitch Drupal as a solution to a small non-profit that wants something a bit more reliable than a brochureware site where only one person can add new pages or events. Wish me luck.
Off to pitch Drupal as a solution to a small non-profit that wantssomething a bit more reliable than a brochureware site where onlyone person can add new pages or events. Wish me luck.
Another job

Questions

Oct 14, 2008

When you get the second question asking if "harmful tobacco products" should be banned, you begin to get the feeling that no one is editing these things.

I am now marked as "Greedy" on my OKCupid home page. This was not there until I answered a question about a spouse's minimum-wage job by selecting (from memory) "I would have a problem if they didn't want to improve."

Look, marriage is a partnership. As someone on the net recently remarked, marriage is a small, two-person business. If I was wealthy, I wouldn't have a problem with it at all (aside from the possibility that they would never grow or change as a McDonald's cashier; that would be a big problem). I would have no problem with someone staying at home with the kids, getting a part-time, minimum-wage job or anything else, if it worked for the relationship.

So, that's why I'm greedy. You will also see a Republican elephant there: that appeared after I clicked, "I see no logical problem being pro-death penalty and anti-abortion." I am definitely not pro-abortion, though I'm not for outlawing it whole and entire, either. But simply, there is no logical inconsistency with the above position. If you disagree, fine; if you're pro-choice then the above position fails on values: fine, but you cannot claim the above position fails on logic.

Comments must be approved by the author.

When you get the second question asking if "harmful tobaccoproducts" should be banned, you begin to get the feeling that noone is editing these things.

I am now marked as "Greedy" on my OKCupid home page. This was notthere until I answered a question about a spouse's minimum-wage jobby selecting (from memory) "I would have a problem if they didn'twant to improve."

Look, marriage is a partnership. As someone on the net recentlyremarked, marriage is a small, two-person business. If I waswealthy, I wouldn't have a problem with it at all (aside from thepossibility that they would never grow or change as a McDonald'scashier; that would be a big problem). I would have no problem withsomeone staying at home with the kids, getting a part-time,minimum-wage job or anything else, if it worked for therelationship.

So, that's why I'm greedy. You will also see a Republican elephantthere: that appeared after I clicked, "I see no logical problembeing pro-death penalty and anti-abortion." I am definitely notpro-abortion, though I'm not for outlawing it whole and entire,either. But simply, there is no logical inconsistency with theabove position. If you disagree, fine; if you're pro-choice thenthe above position fails on values: fine, but you cannot claim theabove position fails on logic.
Questions