Find better matches with our advanced matching system
—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy
seeldevil
43 / M / Bisexual / Single
Kalamazoo, Michigan
His journal posts
Another job
May 13, 2009
Off to pitch Drupal as a solution to a small non-profit that wants
something a bit more reliable than a brochureware site where only
one person can add new pages or events. Wish me luck.
Questions
Oct 14, 2008
When you get the second question asking if "harmful tobacco
products" should be banned, you begin to get the feeling that no
one is editing these things.
I am now marked as "Greedy" on my OKCupid home page. This was not there until I answered a question about a spouse's minimum-wage job by selecting (from memory) "I would have a problem if they didn't want to improve."
Look, marriage is a partnership. As someone on the net recently remarked, marriage is a small, two-person business. If I was wealthy, I wouldn't have a problem with it at all (aside from the possibility that they would never grow or change as a McDonald's cashier; that would be a big problem). I would have no problem with someone staying at home with the kids, getting a part-time, minimum-wage job or anything else, if it worked for the relationship.
So, that's why I'm greedy. You will also see a Republican elephant there: that appeared after I clicked, "I see no logical problem being pro-death penalty and anti-abortion." I am definitely not pro-abortion, though I'm not for outlawing it whole and entire, either. But simply, there is no logical inconsistency with the above position. If you disagree, fine; if you're pro-choice then the above position fails on values: fine, but you cannot claim the above position fails on logic.
I am now marked as "Greedy" on my OKCupid home page. This was not there until I answered a question about a spouse's minimum-wage job by selecting (from memory) "I would have a problem if they didn't want to improve."
Look, marriage is a partnership. As someone on the net recently remarked, marriage is a small, two-person business. If I was wealthy, I wouldn't have a problem with it at all (aside from the possibility that they would never grow or change as a McDonald's cashier; that would be a big problem). I would have no problem with someone staying at home with the kids, getting a part-time, minimum-wage job or anything else, if it worked for the relationship.
So, that's why I'm greedy. You will also see a Republican elephant there: that appeared after I clicked, "I see no logical problem being pro-death penalty and anti-abortion." I am definitely not pro-abortion, though I'm not for outlawing it whole and entire, either. But simply, there is no logical inconsistency with the above position. If you disagree, fine; if you're pro-choice then the above position fails on values: fine, but you cannot claim the above position fails on logic.
Comments must be approved by the author.