Message Him

Join OkCupid

Find better matches with our advanced matching system

—% Match —% Friend —% Enemy

stanulam59

27 / M / Bisexual / Single

Brooklyn, New York

His journal posts

Problems with question structure

Apr 7, 2010

Lots of questions are phrased as "How do you feel about your partner doing xyz?" This is bad form, since all questions have that component inherent to them in the "how should your partner respond?" followup. Asking "how should your partner feel about you feeling" needlessly complicates the question and disrupts the radio-button/ checkbox response format.

Lots of questions are phrased as "How do you feel about yourpartner doing xyz?" This is bad form, since all questions have thatcomponent inherent to them in the "how should your partnerrespond?" followup. Asking "how should your partner feel about youfeeling" needlessly complicates the question and disrupts theradio-button/ checkbox response format.

Problems with question structure

efficiently categorizing sexual preference

Mar 14, 2010

So this is probably just a massive confirmation bias on my part, but it sure seems like there are a lot of bi girls on this site. A large part of this probably stems from the filters and preferences I've set up, but it still seems like a statistically irregular amount; that is, it feels like the site attracts people of less-popular orientations.

Of course, it's a bit more complex than that. I've seen a few pretty common patterns in the Bi female profiles:

1. Single women that are a little interested in women but are probably going to settle into long-term hetero relationships 

2. Single women that are a little interested in men, but are probably going to settle into long-term gay relationships

3. Women that have boyfriends but are looking for girls, on the side or for threesomes

4. Members of big polyamorous pile.

(There must be some women in lesbian relationships that are looking for men on the side, but I haven't seen any yet.)

The same must be true for men; I haven't been browsing a lot of their profiles, but I'd likely put myself in the equivalent to category 1, with aspirations of being the male partner in category 3.

Now, a member of any one of these categories will be listed as Bi on their profile, but clearly they all have distinct needs, and this site should try to accommodate them. I propose that, instead of listing your orientation and availability, you list only what you are seeking. Therefore, instead of my status being 24/Bi/Single, it would say that I am seeking (in order of preference) women, groups, men. Were I to end up in a monogamous relationship, then I would simply change my status such that I am not seeking anyone. 

This may seem like its unnecessarily complicating things, but this is how Facebook handles sexual preference, and people seem to understand that.

So this is probably just a massive confirmation bias on my part,but it sure seems like there are a lot of bi girls on this site. Alarge part of this probably stems from the filters and preferencesI've set up, but it still seems like a statistically irregularamount; that is, it feels like the site attracts people ofless-popular orientations.

Of course, it's a bit more complex than that. I've seen a fewpretty common patterns in the Bi female profiles:

1. Single women that are a little interested in women but areprobably going to settle into long-term heterorelationships 

2. Single women that are a little interested in men, but areprobably going to settle into long-term gay relationships

3. Women that have boyfriends but are looking for girls, on theside or for threesomes

4. Members of big polyamorous pile.

(There must be some women in lesbian relationships that arelooking for men on the side, but I haven't seen any yet.)

The same must be true for men; I haven't been browsing a lot oftheir profiles, but I'd likely put myself in the equivalent tocategory 1, with aspirations of being the male partner in category3.

Now, a member of any one of these categories will be listed asBi on their profile, but clearly they all have distinct needs, andthis site should try to accommodate them. I propose that, insteadof listing your orientation and availability, you list only whatyou are seeking. Therefore, instead of my status being24/Bi/Single, it would say that I am seeking (in order ofpreference) women, groups, men. Were I to end up in a monogamousrelationship, then I would simply change my status such that I amnot seeking anyone. 

This may seem like its unnecessarily complicating things, butthis is how Facebook handles sexual preference, and people seem tounderstand that.

efficiently categorizing sexual preference

the inaugural and inevitable...

Mar 6, 2010

"what the hell is a journal for?" post. I respect the OKcupid guys a lot - I even bought a Bishop Allen record once - but this seems like a "hey, web 2.0, let's stick a blog on it!" kind of idea. Cause lord knows you cant get a blog anywhere else! But the staff robot insists that I write something here, and I tend to do whatever a robot tells me. Anyways, I'm gonna use this space to talk about my relationship with this site and a little about gender identity or whatever. 

I first joined this site ages and ages ago, pretty much right when it started. I was a freshman in college for the first time, and I had and on and off thing going with my high school girlfriend. I never really used it much then because I was still prejudiced against internet dating, but I really liked filling out all the tests and that sort of thing, being a 17 year old and all.

Years later, after meeting a girl on myspace(!) and basically living with her for four years, I find myself back in the pool, and in a peculiar situation. I look back at a lot of the answers I gave and don't recognize the guy - when I joined I had never smoked, never drank, and was strongly anti-drug. (I had also just read a bunch of Ayn Rand, as angry teens often do.) 

But in a lot of ways, I am the same guy I was then; I'm just less of a dick about it. Most of what I've changed since then reflects not a dramatic shift in my opinions or lifestyle, but just a more open mind.

This is the part where I bitch about how the site reinforces the certainty of young adulthood. While they make great strides in accommodating every lifestyle with the questions, they don't give nearly enough granularity with the sidebar info. For example: the biggest change I've made to my profile is in sexual orientation. However, this isn't some big shift from me; I was starting to be interested in boys and trans in college; I'm just man enough to admit it now. However, I still strongly prefer people with the opposite set of parts; I suspect there are a lot of men like me on the site that identify as straight out of social pressure. Conversely, there are tons of women who identify as bi here, but that can range all the way from "tee hee, i'll let you imagine me having a threesome" to "i've always preferred women but i'm keeping an open mind." For frig's sake, the Kinsey scale has been around for like fifty years.

On a similar note, I'm a little worried that I'm giving the wrong impression with the other lifestyle questions. Does pot still count as a drug? In MA you get a fine for possession. Yet okcupid treats "I take a puff when I'm at a party and they pass the pipe around" the same as "I bought an eight-ball for the weekend." 

"what the hell is a journal for?" post. I respect the OKcupidguys a lot - I even bought a Bishop Allen record once - but thisseems like a "hey, web 2.0, let's stick a blog on it!" kind ofidea. Cause lord knows you cant get a blog anywhere else! But thestaff robot insists that I write something here, and I tend to dowhatever a robot tells me. Anyways, I'm gonna use this spaceto talk about my relationship with this site and a little aboutgender identity or whatever. 

I first joined this site ages and ages ago, pretty much rightwhen it started. I was a freshman in college for the first time,and I had and on and off thing going with my high schoolgirlfriend. I never really used it much then because I was stillprejudiced against internet dating, but I really liked filling outall the tests and that sort of thing, being a 17 year old andall.

Years later, after meeting a girl on myspace(!) and basicallyliving with her for four years, I find myself back in the pool, andin a peculiar situation. I look back at a lot of the answers I gaveand don't recognize the guy - when I joined I had never smoked,never drank, and was strongly anti-drug. (I had also just read abunch of Ayn Rand, as angry teens often do.) 

But in a lot of ways, I am the same guy I was then; I'm justless of a dick about it. Most of what I've changed since thenreflects not a dramatic shift in my opinions or lifestyle, but justa more open mind.

This is the part where I bitch about how the sitereinforces the certainty of young adulthood. Whilethey make great strides in accommodating every lifestylewith the questions, they don't give nearly enough granularity withthe sidebar info. For example: the biggest change I've made to myprofile is in sexual orientation. However, this isn't some bigshift from me; I was starting to be interested in boys and trans incollege; I'm just man enough to admit it now. However, I stillstrongly prefer people with the opposite set of parts; I suspectthere are a lot of men like me on the site that identify asstraight out of social pressure. Conversely, there are tons ofwomen who identify as bi here, but that can range all the way from"tee hee, i'll let you imagine me having a threesome" to "i'vealways preferred women but i'm keeping an open mind." For frig'ssake, the Kinsey scale has been around for like fifty years.

On a similar note, I'm a little worried that I'm giving thewrong impression with the other lifestyle questions. Does pot stillcount as a drug? In MA you get a fine for possession. Yetokcupid treats "I take a puff when I'm at a party and they pass thepipe around" the same as "I bought an eight-ball for theweekend." 

the inaugural and inevitable...