Find better matches with our advanced matching system
succotash_54
31 / M / Straight / Seeing someone
Everett, Washington
His journal posts
Better tagging.
Nov 23, 2010
I've noticed in the past that OKC lists my compatibility higher based on us both having an interest in tattoos. But that's the problem... I don't like tattoos, generally speaking. I think they detract, much like excessive makeup or fake tanning. But it assumes I does because the word "tattoos" is included in the sentence, "I don't care for tattoos." So, I guess either we need to not list what we don't like, which doesn't make sense, or a more scrutinous system need be in place.
That's not to say OKC is slacking. Quite to the contrary, they're doing a good job. I just wish the Search function had some more intermediate search ranges... somewhere between 100 or 500 miles and "anywhere." Just a thought.
Comments must be approved by the author.
How that doesn't make sense? Wouldn't it be better to say what you do like and start from there? It's certainly a more positive approach.
Search has 25, 50, 100, 250, 500 miles and anywhere.
A former user commented on Nov 23, 2010
succotash_54 commented on Nov 24, 2010