OkCupid.com: Free Online Dating
“The Google ofonline dating”
— The Boston Globe
“The bestfree dating site”
“A favorite hangoutfor internet goers”
— The Village Voice
— Some guy on Yelp
Yes, hate motivated crime must be stopped at all costs.
No. A crime is a crime. Increase sentances for all violent crimes, regardless of motive. We cannot legislate against thought.
Yes. Pornography is degrading to women and/or a sin. It should be outlawed.
No. Free speech means that sometimes you get offended. and it means defending the rights of others, even if you disagree with their point of view.
No. On the other hand, I think that five dollars is too high a price to pay for pornography.
Religion should have no place in politics. Only cold logic.
No. If you demand expressions of religious piety from politicans, you are just asking to be lied to.
Their beliefs are important to them and you should respect them.
Even though you may not share their beliefs you should try and respect their wishes in the interest of family harmony/general kindness.
If they want to act like uptight holier-than-thou morally superior jerks then they deserve to be offended.
Its one thing to be asked to respect someones religion. Its quite another thing to be asked to respect their religious taboos. They need to be more open-minded.
Yes, they still present a threat to the United States.
No.Its insane that we continue to embargo Cuba when we have trade relations with China and Russia.
No. It is a closed document and the Founders provided a constitutional means of changing it through the Amendment system.
No. It is a closed document. All laws must flow from it. Any assertion that the Constitution may be outdated is un-patriotic!
Yes. The Founders could not forsee issues like abortion, gay rights, and privacy in the Internet Age. The Constitution must be open to interpretation in order to keep pace with the progress of society.
Yes, an eye for an eye.
Yes, while capital punishment is horrible it serves as a deterrent to even more horrific crimes.
No, blood only brings blood.
No, not only is capital punishment cruel it has never been shown to be a deterrent against violent crime.
Yes, the United States is the only country in the world with the means to stop slaughters like Darfur.
Yes. If we see something we disagree with, we should act to stop it. Like Mother Teresa with First Strike capability.
No, the US has been the worlds policeman for far too long. Time to let the UN earn the money we pay them and send in peacekeepers.
No. We should try to help on the economic and humanitarian fronts, but we cannot invade a country and risk the lives of Americans just to save peolpe we will never meet.
Yes, their are a danger to the entire world and only trustworthy nations should have them.
No. Economic sanctions and UN resolutions are much more effective.
Possibly, depending on our relations with that country. Because when a citizen of your country can build a bomb and blow up something in my country, what goes on in your country is very much my business.
Yes. Any law restricting a citizens right to own or a companies right to manufacture a gun (or type of gun) violates the constitution.
Yes. If everyone had all the guns they wanted and were well trained in their use we could reduce violent crime in this country.
No. In the interest of public saftey some types of guns must be removed from common usage.
No. The amendment is anachronistic and completely meaningless today. Guns, especially assualt weapons, represent a danger to everyone they come in contact with and and are not necessary for defense.
Yes, whether you agree with abortion or not the public has a right to know a judges position on it.
Yes. We need to stop activist judges and protect life. Only Pro-life judges should be appointed.
Yes. We need to protect Roe Vs. Wade and a womens right to choose. Only Pro-Choice judges should be appointed.
No. While abortion is a significant issue it is only a minor part of the legal issues judges must deal with and making a judges appointment about a singal issue reflects an incredibly narrow-minded view of the legal system.
No on both. Homosexuals should not be allowed to marry, enter into civil unions or vote.
No, they should not be allowed to marry. Marriage is a sacred pact between God, a man, and a woman. Civil unions are just fine.
Yes, the should be allowed to marry. But not yet. Society just is not ready for it and if we force the issue it will take longer. Civil unions are just fine for now.
Yes. They should be allowed to marry and no civil unions are not enough. There is no way to say "civil unions are enough" without implying that homosexual love is inferior to heterosexual love and that is unacceptable.
Yes. Keep our money at hope to help Americans in need.
No. Foreign aid helps improve developing countries and the world as a whole. It is our duty to help.
No. And I am concerned about the 8% who felt it was too high, but were unable to grasp the nuance in deciding it should be cut.
On or in your skin?
On you clohes?
In your heart?
It cannot be measured or displayed like a billboard. It is in actions and thought.
The REAL Adult Baby Test
subsophe25 / m / Bisexual
The What Type of Flirt Are You Test
R0B013M19 / m / Straight
The Cube Test
ok_mark_andrew35 / m / Straight
The 100 Point Sexual Purity Test
c10abstomb21 / m / Gay
The What Type of Person are You? Test
Grri42 / m / Straight
Forget your password?
Or visit us in your mobile browser.